[v2,21/37] baseband/acc100: check for unlikely operation vals
Checks
Commit Message
Add unlikely checks for NULL operation values.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
---
drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Comments
On 8/20/22 04:31, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Add unlikely checks for NULL operation values.
Same as for patch 20, this is a fix.
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> index 70a29f92a1..ea850e2d7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> @@ -3148,6 +3148,10 @@ enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc100_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
> r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;
>
> while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
> + if (unlikely(input == 0)) {
> + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Not enough input segment");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset;
> /* Set up DMA descriptor */
> desc = q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_head + total_enqueued_cbs)
> @@ -4491,6 +4495,8 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> }
> enqueued_cbs += ret;
> }
> + if (unlikely(enqueued_cbs == 0))
> + return 0; /* Nothing to enqueue */
>
> acc100_dma_enqueue(q, enqueued_cbs, &q_data->queue_stats);
>
> @@ -5051,6 +5057,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
> op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs)
> & q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr;
> + if (unlikely(op == NULL))
> + break;
> if (op->turbo_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
> ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
> &aq_dequeued);
> @@ -5096,6 +5104,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
> op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs)
> & q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr;
> + if (unlikely(op == NULL))
> + break;
> if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
> ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
> &aq_dequeued);
With commit message ammended:
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Maxime
@@ -3148,6 +3148,10 @@ enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(struct acc100_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op,
r = op->turbo_enc.tb_params.r;
while (mbuf_total_left > 0 && r < c) {
+ if (unlikely(input == 0)) {
+ rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Not enough input segment");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
seg_total_left = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(input) - in_offset;
/* Set up DMA descriptor */
desc = q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_head + total_enqueued_cbs)
@@ -4491,6 +4495,8 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
}
enqueued_cbs += ret;
}
+ if (unlikely(enqueued_cbs == 0))
+ return 0; /* Nothing to enqueue */
acc100_dma_enqueue(q, enqueued_cbs, &q_data->queue_stats);
@@ -5051,6 +5057,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs)
& q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr;
+ if (unlikely(op == NULL))
+ break;
if (op->turbo_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
&aq_dequeued);
@@ -5096,6 +5104,8 @@ acc100_dequeue_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
for (i = 0; i < dequeue_num; ++i) {
op = (q->ring_addr + ((q->sw_ring_tail + dequeued_cbs)
& q->sw_ring_wrap_mask))->req.op_addr;
+ if (unlikely(op == NULL))
+ break;
if (op->ldpc_dec.code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_TRANSPORT_BLOCK)
ret = dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(q, &ops[i], dequeued_cbs,
&aq_dequeued);