[dpdk-dev] eal: shut up warning about master lcore
Checks
Commit Message
This message looks suspicious and seen on healthy testpmd.
EAL: WARNING: Master core has no memory on local socket!
The message is wrong: the master lcore is 0 and its socket is 0
and there are multiple available memory segments on socket 0.
At that point in the startup process, the count value is zero,
meaning they are not used yet so the check_socket gets confused.
Fixes: 66cc45e293ed ("mem: replace memseg with memseg lists")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
Comments
On 26-Apr-18 1:48 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This message looks suspicious and seen on healthy testpmd.
> EAL: WARNING: Master core has no memory on local socket!
>
> The message is wrong: the master lcore is 0 and its socket is 0
> and there are multiple available memory segments on socket 0.
>
> At that point in the startup process, the count value is zero,
> meaning they are not used yet so the check_socket gets confused.
>
> Fixes: 66cc45e293ed ("mem: replace memseg with memseg lists")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
Was aware of this and going to fix it myself, but higher priority items
popped up. Thanks for fixing this!
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
26/04/2018 09:44, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 26-Apr-18 1:48 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > This message looks suspicious and seen on healthy testpmd.
> > EAL: WARNING: Master core has no memory on local socket!
> >
> > The message is wrong: the master lcore is 0 and its socket is 0
> > and there are multiple available memory segments on socket 0.
> >
> > At that point in the startup process, the count value is zero,
> > meaning they are not used yet so the check_socket gets confused.
> >
> > Fixes: 66cc45e293ed ("mem: replace memseg with memseg lists")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
>
> Was aware of this and going to fix it myself, but higher priority items
> popped up. Thanks for fixing this!
>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Applied, thanks
@@ -645,10 +645,7 @@ check_socket(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl, void *arg)
{
int *socket_id = arg;
- if (msl->socket_id == *socket_id && msl->memseg_arr.count != 0)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
+ return *socket_id == msl->socket_id;
}
static void