[1/1] vfio: Make buildable with MUSL runtime
Checks
Commit Message
From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
---
drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Comments
On 5/20/2023 7:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
>
> pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
> other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> index fab3483d9f8108fafaff6d022cd41165d1ec5a61..fe83e1a04ec2e7a891425144be3e0aacecb24f09 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
> */
>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
22/05/2023 11:27, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 5/20/2023 7:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
> >
> > pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
> > other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
It was "buildable" already, and I don't understand how.
In any doubt, I've added Cc: stable@dpdk.org for backports.
Applied, thanks.
> On May 23, 2023, at 5:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 22/05/2023 11:27, Burakov, Anatoly:
>> On 5/20/2023 7:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
>>>
>>> pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
>>> other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
>> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>
> It was "buildable" already, and I don't understand how.
> In any doubt, I've added Cc: stable@dpdk.org for backports.
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
>
Yeah, it builds with glibc just fine. MUSL is another story...
23/05/2023 17:46, Philip Prindeville:
>
> > On May 23, 2023, at 5:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > 22/05/2023 11:27, Burakov, Anatoly:
> >> On 5/20/2023 7:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> >>> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
> >>>
> >>> pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
> >>> other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
> >> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >
> > It was "buildable" already, and I don't understand how.
> > In any doubt, I've added Cc: stable@dpdk.org for backports.
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
>
> Yeah, it builds with glibc just fine. MUSL is another story...
It is also building on Alpine/musl.
I would like to understand why.
Do you have failure logs and versions?
> On May 23, 2023, at 11:36 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 23/05/2023 17:46, Philip Prindeville:
>>
>>> On May 23, 2023, at 5:33 AM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> 22/05/2023 11:27, Burakov, Anatoly:
>>>> On 5/20/2023 7:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>>> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> pread64() and pwrite64() are declared in <unistd.h> in MUSL and
>>>>> other (i.e. not glibc) C runtimes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>>>
>>> It was "buildable" already, and I don't understand how.
>>> In any doubt, I've added Cc: stable@dpdk.org for backports.
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> Yeah, it builds with glibc just fine. MUSL is another story...
>
> It is also building on Alpine/musl.
> I would like to understand why.
> Do you have failure logs and versions?
>
Have a look at:
https://github.com/k13132/openwrt-dpdk/pull/9#issuecomment-1556124647
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
* Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation
*/
+#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <linux/pci_regs.h>