[v2] lib/kni : coding style is fixed
Checks
Commit Message
Coverity issue:
Bugzilla ID: 1227
Fixes:
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org
Coding style is fixed
---
lib/kni/rte_kni.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Comments
On Tue, 16 May 2023 11:03:59 +0000
Yasin CANER <yasinncaner@gmail.com> wrote:
> + /* First, getting allocation count from alloc_q. alloc_q is allocated in this function*/
> + /* and/or kni_alloc function from mempool.*/
> + /* If alloc_q is completely removed, it shall be allocated again.*/
If you send another version of this patch. It would be good to follow the style of multi-line comment.
/* First, getting allocation count from alloc_q. alloc_q is allocated in this function
* and/or kni_alloc function from mempool.
* If alloc_q is completely removed, it shall be allocated again.
*/
@@ -683,20 +683,21 @@ kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni)
RTE_LOG(ERR, KNI, "No valid mempool for allocating mbufs\n");
return;
}
- /* First, getting allocation count from alloc_q. alloc_q is allocated in this function
- * and/or kni_alloc function from mempool.
- * If alloc_q is completely removed, it shall be allocated again.
- * */
+
+ /* First, getting allocation count from alloc_q. alloc_q is allocated in this function*/
+ /* and/or kni_alloc function from mempool.*/
+ /* If alloc_q is completely removed, it shall be allocated again.*/
+
allocq = kni_fifo_count(kni->alloc_q);
/* How many free allocation is possible from mempool. */
allocq_free = kni_fifo_free_count(kni->alloc_q);
/* Allocated alloc_q count shall be max MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM. */
allocq_count = MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM - (int)allocq;
/* Try to figure out how many allocation is possible. allocq_free is max possible.*/
- allocq_free = (allocq_free > MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM )? MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM : allocq_free;
+ allocq_free = (allocq_free > MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM) ? MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM : allocq_free;
/* Buffer is not removed so no need re-allocate*/
- if(!allocq_count) {
+ if (!allocq_count) {
/* Buffer is not removed so no need re-allocation*/
return;
} else if (allocq_free > allocq_count) {