eal/bsd: fix spinlock not unlock in alarm callback
Checks
Commit Message
The spinlock should unlock when clock_gettime() failed. This patch
fixes it by invoking clock_gettime() before lock.
Fixes: 26021a715067 ("eal/bsd: support alarm API")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
---
lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
add cc maintainer
On 2023/2/13 20:44, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> The spinlock should unlock when clock_gettime() failed. This patch
> fixes it by invoking clock_gettime() before lock.
>
> Fixes: 26021a715067 ("eal/bsd: support alarm API")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> index 1023c32937..1a3e6c0aad 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> @@ -171,12 +171,12 @@ eal_alarm_callback(void *arg __rte_unused)
> struct timespec now;
> struct alarm_entry *ap;
>
> - rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
> - ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
> -
> if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_TYPE_ID, &now) < 0)
> return;
>
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
> + ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
> +
> while (ap != NULL && timespec_cmp(&now, &ap->time) >= 0) {
> ap->executing = 1;
> ap->executing_id = pthread_self();
>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:28:17AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> add cc maintainer
>
> On 2023/2/13 20:44, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> > The spinlock should unlock when clock_gettime() failed. This patch
> > fixes it by invoking clock_gettime() before lock.
> >
> > Fixes: 26021a715067 ("eal/bsd: support alarm API")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> > index 1023c32937..1a3e6c0aad 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> > +++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
> > @@ -171,12 +171,12 @@ eal_alarm_callback(void *arg __rte_unused)
> > struct timespec now;
> > struct alarm_entry *ap;
> >
> > - rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
> > - ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
> > -
> > if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_TYPE_ID, &now) < 0)
> > return;
> >
> > + rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
> > + ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
> > +
> > while (ap != NULL && timespec_cmp(&now, &ap->time) >= 0) {
> > ap->executing = 1;
> > ap->executing_id = pthread_self();
> >
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
16/02/2023 10:22, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:28:17AM +0800, fengchengwen wrote:
> > add cc maintainer
> >
> > On 2023/2/13 20:44, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> > > The spinlock should unlock when clock_gettime() failed. This patch
> > > fixes it by invoking clock_gettime() before lock.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 26021a715067 ("eal/bsd: support alarm API")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Applied, thanks.
@@ -171,12 +171,12 @@ eal_alarm_callback(void *arg __rte_unused)
struct timespec now;
struct alarm_entry *ap;
- rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
- ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
-
if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_TYPE_ID, &now) < 0)
return;
+ rte_spinlock_lock(&alarm_list_lk);
+ ap = LIST_FIRST(&alarm_list);
+
while (ap != NULL && timespec_cmp(&now, &ap->time) >= 0) {
ap->executing = 1;
ap->executing_id = pthread_self();