[v8,2/5] eal: use wait event for read pflock
Checks
Commit Message
Instead of polling for read pflock update, use wait event scheme for
this case.
Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 1:50 PM Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of polling for read pflock update, use wait event scheme for
> this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> ---
> lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h
> index e57c179ef2..7573b036bf 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_pflock.h
> @@ -121,9 +121,7 @@ rte_pflock_read_lock(rte_pflock_t *pf)
> return;
>
> /* Wait for current write phase to complete. */
> - while ((__atomic_load_n(&pf->rd.in, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)
> - & RTE_PFLOCK_WBITS) == w)
> - rte_pause();
> + rte_wait_event(&pf->rd.in, RTE_PFLOCK_WBITS, ==, w, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:20 AM Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of polling for read pflock update, use wait event scheme for
> this case.
Please look at git history for this file.
Prefix should be pflock:
>
> Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
@@ -121,9 +121,7 @@ rte_pflock_read_lock(rte_pflock_t *pf)
return;
/* Wait for current write phase to complete. */
- while ((__atomic_load_n(&pf->rd.in, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE)
- & RTE_PFLOCK_WBITS) == w)
- rte_pause();
+ rte_wait_event(&pf->rd.in, RTE_PFLOCK_WBITS, ==, w, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
}
/**