Message ID | 20201201072421.8327-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | Ferruh Yigit |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/2] common/sfc_efx/base: remove warnings about inline specifiers | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
ci/checkpatch | success | coding style OK |
On 12/1/2020 7:24 AM, Ivan Malov wrote: > Windows build of the current libefx rejects these specifiers. > They're unneeded anyway; the compiler should decide inlining. > > Fixes: 34285fd0891d ("common/sfc_efx/base: add match spec validate API") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> > Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amoreton@xilinx.com> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c index ee0a3d319..cbc1cb28c 100644 --- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c +++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_equal( ((_mask)[(_bit) / (_mask_page_nbits)] & \ (1ULL << ((_bit) & ((_mask_page_nbits) - 1)))) -static inline boolean_t +static boolean_t efx_mask_is_prefix( __in size_t mask_nbytes, __in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp) @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ efx_mask_is_prefix( return B_TRUE; } -static inline boolean_t +static boolean_t efx_mask_is_all_ones( __in size_t mask_nbytes, __in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp) @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ efx_mask_is_all_ones( return (t == (uint8_t)(~0)); } -static inline boolean_t +static boolean_t efx_mask_is_all_zeros( __in size_t mask_nbytes, __in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp)