[2/3] test/hash: free allocated memory

  Free allocated memory.

Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
  

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:25 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

> Free allocated memory.
>
> Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> index e9aca6ff4..e92d1065b 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> @@ -1431,6 +1431,8 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void)
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks);
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent);
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path);
> +       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt);
> +       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt);
>         rte_free(scanned_bkts);
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.17.1
>


I inspected this test a little more, I can see other leaks.
- generate_keys(), on error, we are leaking tbl_rwc_test_param.h.
- test_rwc_reader(), we are leaking pos.
- test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(), we are leaking
tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path

Looking at your patch 1, I would prefer you reset tbl_rwc_test_param field
per field to NULL once the rte_free() is called.
It would then be easier for you to track the remaining leaks (and patch 1
disappears).
  

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:25 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>> wrote:
Free allocated memory.

Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org<mailto:stable@dpdk.org>

Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>>
Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com<mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>>
---
 app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
index e9aca6ff4..e92d1065b 100644
--- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
@@ -1431,6 +1431,8 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void)
        rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks);
        rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent);
        rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path);
+       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt);
+       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt);
        rte_free(scanned_bkts);
        return 0;
 }
--
2.17.1


I inspected this test a little more, I can see other leaks.
- generate_keys(), on error, we are leaking tbl_rwc_test_param.h.
- test_rwc_reader(), we are leaking pos.
- test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(), we are leaking tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path
[Honnappa] Thanks for the review. I fixed these and few more in V2.

Looking at your patch 1, I would prefer you reset tbl_rwc_test_param field per field to NULL once the rte_free() is called.
It would then be easier for you to track the remaining leaks (and patch 1 disappears).
[Honnappa] This can be considered as initialization code. I have left this as it is.


--
David Marchand
  

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 6:59 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:25 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
> honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>> wrote:
> Free allocated memory.
>
> Fixes: 3f9aab961ed3 ("test/hash: check lock-free extendable bucket")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org<mailto:stable@dpdk.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com<mailto:
> honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>>
> Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com<mailto:
> dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>>
> ---
>  app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> index e9aca6ff4..e92d1065b 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c
> @@ -1431,6 +1431,8 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void)
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks);
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent);
>         rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path);
> +       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt);
> +       rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt);
>         rte_free(scanned_bkts);
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> I inspected this test a little more, I can see other leaks.
> - generate_keys(), on error, we are leaking tbl_rwc_test_param.h.
> - test_rwc_reader(), we are leaking pos.
> - test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(), we are leaking
> tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path
> [Honnappa] Thanks for the review. I fixed these and few more in V2.
>

Still missed pos in some err path.
Comment incoming.


> Looking at your patch 1, I would prefer you reset tbl_rwc_test_param field
> per field to NULL once the rte_free() is called.
> It would then be easier for you to track the remaining leaks (and patch 1
> disappears).
> [Honnappa] This can be considered as initialization code. I have left this
> as it is.
>

Ok, I won't insist.