[dpdk-dev,v4,11/17] eal/soc: add default scan for Soc devices

Message ID 1476539108-13170-12-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Shreyansh Jain Oct. 15, 2016, 1:45 p.m. UTC
  From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>

Default implementation which scans the sysfs platform devices hierarchy.
For each device, extract the ueven and convert into rte_soc_device.

The information populated can then be used in probe to match against
the drivers registered.

Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
[Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h |  10 +-
 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_soc.c   | 315 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 324 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Jan Viktorin Oct. 16, 2016, 12:56 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:15:02 +0530
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> wrote:

> From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
> 
> Default implementation which scans the sysfs platform devices hierarchy.
> For each device, extract the ueven and convert into rte_soc_device.
> 
> The information populated can then be used in probe to match against
> the drivers registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
> [Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>

[...]

> +
> +int
> +rte_eal_soc_scan(void)

What about naming it rte_eal_soc_scan_default? This would underline the
fact that this function can be replaced.

Second, this is for the 7/17 patch:
 
-/* register a driver */
 void
 rte_eal_soc_register(struct rte_soc_driver *driver)
 {
+	/* For a valid soc driver, match and scan function
+	 * should be provided.
+	 */
+	RTE_VERIFY(driver != NULL);
+	RTE_VERIFY(driver->match_fn != NULL);
+	RTE_VERIFY(driver->scan_fn != NULL);

What about setting the match_fn and scan_fn to default implementations if they
are NULL? This would make the standard/default approach easier to use.

 	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_driver_list, driver, next);
 }
 

> +{
> +	struct dirent *e;
> +	DIR *dir;
> +	char dirname[PATH_MAX];
> +
> +	dir = opendir(soc_get_sysfs_path());
> +	if (dir == NULL) {
> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): opendir failed: %s\n",
> +			__func__, strerror(errno));
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	while ((e = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
> +		if (e->d_name[0] == '.')
> +			continue;
> +
> +		snprintf(dirname, sizeof(dirname), "%s/%s",
> +				soc_get_sysfs_path(), e->d_name);
> +		if (soc_scan_one(dirname, e->d_name) < 0)
> +			goto error;
> +	}
> +	closedir(dir);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +error:
> +	closedir(dir);
> +	return -1;
> +}
> +
>  /* Init the SoC EAL subsystem */
>  int
>  rte_eal_soc_init(void)
  
Shreyansh Jain Oct. 16, 2016, 7:12 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jan,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin@rehivetech.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 6:27 AM
> To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; david.marchand@6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/17] eal/soc: add default scan for Soc devices
> 
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:15:02 +0530
> Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
> >
> > Default implementation which scans the sysfs platform devices hierarchy.
> > For each device, extract the ueven and convert into rte_soc_device.
> >
> > The information populated can then be used in probe to match against
> > the drivers registered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
> > [Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +
> > +int
> > +rte_eal_soc_scan(void)
> 
> What about naming it rte_eal_soc_scan_default? This would underline the
> fact that this function can be replaced.

Yes, that would be in sync with match default. I will do it.

> 
> Second, this is for the 7/17 patch:
> 
> -/* register a driver */
>  void
>  rte_eal_soc_register(struct rte_soc_driver *driver)
>  {
> +	/* For a valid soc driver, match and scan function
> +	 * should be provided.
> +	 */
> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver != NULL);
> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->match_fn != NULL);
> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->scan_fn != NULL);
> 
> What about setting the match_fn and scan_fn to default implementations if
> they
> are NULL? This would make the standard/default approach easier to use.
> 
>  	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_driver_list, driver, next);
>  }

I am not in favor of a forced default. What if user never intended it - it would lead to wrong scan being used and only intimation which can provided to user is a log.
Selecting such functions should be a model of PMD - one which is enforced.

> 
> > +{
> > +	struct dirent *e;
> > +	DIR *dir;
> > +	char dirname[PATH_MAX];
> > +
> > +	dir = opendir(soc_get_sysfs_path());
> > +	if (dir == NULL) {
> > +		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): opendir failed: %s\n",
> > +			__func__, strerror(errno));
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	while ((e = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
> > +		if (e->d_name[0] == '.')
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		snprintf(dirname, sizeof(dirname), "%s/%s",
> > +				soc_get_sysfs_path(), e->d_name);
> > +		if (soc_scan_one(dirname, e->d_name) < 0)
> > +			goto error;
> > +	}
> > +	closedir(dir);
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +error:
> > +	closedir(dir);
> > +	return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Init the SoC EAL subsystem */
> >  int
> >  rte_eal_soc_init(void)
> 
> 
> 
> --
>   Jan Viktorin                E-mail: Viktorin@RehiveTech.com
>   System Architect            Web:    www.RehiveTech.com
>   RehiveTech
>   Brno, Czech Republic

Thanks for your quick comments.

I have not yet taken all the inputs you had provided in review of v3 - I will be replying to those soon marking out what I have taken and what I have not.
 
-
Shreyansh
  
Shreyansh Jain Oct. 24, 2016, 12:08 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jan,

On Sunday 16 October 2016 12:42 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin@rehivetech.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 6:27 AM
>> To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; thomas.monjalon@6wind.com; david.marchand@6wind.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/17] eal/soc: add default scan for Soc devices
>>
>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 19:15:02 +0530
>> Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
>>>
>>> Default implementation which scans the sysfs platform devices hierarchy..
>>> For each device, extract the ueven and convert into rte_soc_device.
>>>
>>> The information populated can then be used in probe to match against
>>> the drivers registered.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
>>> [Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
>>> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +rte_eal_soc_scan(void)
>>
>> What about naming it rte_eal_soc_scan_default? This would underline the
>> fact that this function can be replaced.
>
> Yes, that would be in sync with match default. I will do it.

In v5 I have replaced the name with rte_eal_soc_platform_bus(). This is 
long but it does exactly what the name states - scan for platform bus. 
This is still a helper.

>
>>
>> Second, this is for the 7/17 patch:
>>
>> -/* register a driver */
>>  void
>>  rte_eal_soc_register(struct rte_soc_driver *driver)
>>  {
>> +	/* For a valid soc driver, match and scan function
>> +	 * should be provided.
>> +	 */
>> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver != NULL);
>> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->match_fn != NULL);
>> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->scan_fn != NULL);
>>
>> What about setting the match_fn and scan_fn to default implementations if
>> they
>> are NULL? This would make the standard/default approach easier to use.
>>
>>  	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_driver_list, driver, next);
>>  }
>
> I am not in favor of a forced default. What if user never intended it - it would lead to wrong scan being used and only intimation which can provided to user is a log.
> Selecting such functions should be a model of PMD - one which is enforced.

As mentioned before, I am not in favor of a 'default' implementation. 
Thus, I would rather call these functions as 'helpers' rather than defaults.

[...]

-
Shreyansh
  
Jan Viktorin Oct. 24, 2016, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:38:29 +0530
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> wrote:

> Hi Jan,
> 
> On Sunday 16 October 2016 12:42 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >  

[...]

> >>  
> >>> +
> >>> +int
> >>> +rte_eal_soc_scan(void)  
> >>
> >> What about naming it rte_eal_soc_scan_default? This would underline the
> >> fact that this function can be replaced.  
> >
> > Yes, that would be in sync with match default. I will do it.  
> 
> In v5 I have replaced the name with rte_eal_soc_platform_bus(). This is 
> long but it does exactly what the name states - scan for platform bus. 
> This is still a helper.

OK.

> 
> >  
> >>
> >> Second, this is for the 7/17 patch:
> >>
> >> -/* register a driver */
> >>  void
> >>  rte_eal_soc_register(struct rte_soc_driver *driver)
> >>  {
> >> +	/* For a valid soc driver, match and scan function
> >> +	 * should be provided.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver != NULL);
> >> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->match_fn != NULL);
> >> +	RTE_VERIFY(driver->scan_fn != NULL);
> >>
> >> What about setting the match_fn and scan_fn to default implementations if
> >> they
> >> are NULL? This would make the standard/default approach easier to use.
> >>
> >>  	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_driver_list, driver, next);
> >>  }  
> >
> > I am not in favor of a forced default. What if user never intended it - it would lead to wrong scan being used and only intimation which can provided to user is a log.
> > Selecting such functions should be a model of PMD - one which is enforced.  
> 
> As mentioned before, I am not in favor of a 'default' implementation. 
> Thus, I would rather call these functions as 'helpers' rather than defaults.

Hmm, OK.

Jan

> 
> [...]
> 
> -
> Shreyansh
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h
index 1f5f81b..1865be5 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@  TAILQ_HEAD(soc_driver_list, rte_soc_driver); /**< SoC drivers in D-linked Q. */
 TAILQ_HEAD(soc_device_list, rte_soc_device); /**< SoC devices in D-linked Q. */
 
 struct rte_soc_id {
-	const char *compatible; /**< OF compatible specification */
+	union {
+		const char *compatible; /**< OF compatible specification */
+		char *_compatible;
+	};
 	uint64_t priv_data;     /**< SoC Driver specific data */
 };
 
@@ -200,6 +203,11 @@  rte_eal_parse_soc_spec(const char *spec, struct rte_soc_addr *addr)
 }
 
 /**
+ * Scan for new SoC devices.
+ */
+int rte_eal_soc_scan(void);
+
+/**
  * Default function for matching the Soc driver with device. Each driver can
  * either use this function or define their own soc matching function.
  * This function relies on the compatible string extracted from sysfs. But,
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_soc.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_soc.c
index 3929a76..d8286bb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_soc.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_soc.c
@@ -48,6 +48,321 @@ 
 #include <eal_filesystem.h>
 #include <eal_private.h>
 
+/** Pathname of SoC devices directory. */
+#define SYSFS_SOC_DEVICES "/sys/bus/platform/devices"
+
+static const char *
+soc_get_sysfs_path(void)
+{
+	const char *path = NULL;
+
+	path = getenv("SYSFS_SOC_DEVICES");
+	if (path == NULL)
+		return SYSFS_SOC_DEVICES;
+
+	return path;
+}
+
+static char *
+dev_read_uevent(const char *dirname)
+{
+	char filename[PATH_MAX];
+	struct stat st;
+	char *buf;
+	ssize_t total = 0;
+	int fd;
+
+	snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s/uevent", dirname);
+	fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, "Failed to open file %s\n", filename);
+		return strdup("");
+	}
+
+	if (fstat(fd, &st) < 0) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to stat file %s\n", filename);
+		close(fd);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (st.st_size == 0) {
+		close(fd);
+		return strdup("");
+	}
+
+	buf = malloc(st.st_size + 1);
+	if (buf == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to alloc memory to read %s\n",
+			filename);
+		close(fd);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	while (total < st.st_size) {
+		ssize_t rlen = read(fd, buf + total, st.st_size - total);
+		if (rlen < 0) {
+			if (errno == EINTR)
+				continue;
+
+			RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to read file %s\n", filename);
+
+			free(buf);
+			close(fd);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+		if (rlen == 0) /* EOF */
+			break;
+
+		total += rlen;
+	}
+
+	buf[total] = '\0';
+	close(fd);
+
+	return buf;
+}
+
+static const char *
+dev_uevent_find(const char *uevent, const char *key)
+{
+	const size_t keylen = strlen(key);
+	const size_t total = strlen(uevent);
+	const char *p = uevent;
+
+	/* check whether it is the first key */
+	if (!strncmp(uevent, key, keylen))
+		return uevent + keylen;
+
+	/* check 2nd key or further... */
+	do {
+		p = strstr(p, key);
+		if (p == NULL)
+			break;
+
+		if (p[-1] == '\n') /* check we are at a new line */
+			return p + keylen;
+
+		p += keylen; /* skip this one */
+	} while (p - uevent < (ptrdiff_t) total);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static char *
+strdup_until_nl(const char *p)
+{
+	const char *nl = strchr(p, '\n');
+	if (nl == NULL)
+		return strdup(p); /* no newline, copy until '\0' */
+
+	return strndup(p, nl - p);
+}
+
+static int
+dev_parse_uevent(struct rte_soc_device *dev, const char *uevent)
+{
+	const char *of;
+	const char *compat_n;
+	char *err;
+	long n;
+	char compat[strlen("OF_COMPATIBLE_NNNN=")];
+	long i;
+
+	of = dev_uevent_find(uevent, "OF_FULLNAME=");
+	if (of == NULL)
+		return 1; /* don't care about this device */
+
+	dev->addr.fdt_path = strdup_until_nl(of);
+	if (dev->addr.fdt_path == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
+			"Failed to alloc memory for fdt_path\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Detected device %s (%s)\n",
+			dev->addr.name, dev->addr.fdt_path);
+
+	compat_n = dev_uevent_find(uevent, "OF_COMPATIBLE_N=");
+	if (compat_n == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "No OF_COMPATIBLE_N found\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	n = strtoul(compat_n, &err, 0);
+	if (*err != '\n' && err != NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to parse OF_COMPATIBLE_N: %.10s\n",
+			err);
+		goto fail_fdt_path;
+	}
+
+	if (n == 0)
+		return 1; /* cannot match anything */
+	if (n > 9999) { /* match NNNN */
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "OF_COMPATIBLE_N is invalid: %ld\n", n);
+		goto fail_fdt_path;
+	}
+
+	dev->id = calloc(n + 1, sizeof(*dev->id));
+	if (dev->id == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "Failed to alloc memory for ID\n");
+		free(dev->addr.fdt_path);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+		snprintf(compat, sizeof(compat), "OF_COMPATIBLE_%lu=", i);
+		const char *val;
+
+		val = dev_uevent_find(uevent, compat);
+		if (val == NULL) {
+			RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s was not found\n", compat);
+			goto fail_id;
+		}
+
+		dev->id[i]._compatible = strdup_until_nl(val);
+		if (dev->id[i]._compatible == NULL) {
+			RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
+				"Failed to alloc memory for compatible\n");
+			goto fail_id;
+		}
+
+		RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "  compatible: %s\n",
+				dev->id[i].compatible);
+	}
+
+	dev->id[n]._compatible = NULL; /* mark last one */
+
+	return 0;
+
+fail_id:
+	while (i-- >= 0)
+		free(dev->id[i]._compatible);
+	free(dev->id);
+fail_fdt_path:
+	free(dev->addr.fdt_path);
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static void
+dev_content_free(struct rte_soc_device *dev)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (dev->addr.fdt_path)
+		free(dev->addr.fdt_path);
+
+	if (dev->id != NULL) {
+		for (i = 0; dev->id[i]._compatible; ++i)
+			free(dev->id[i]._compatible);
+
+		free(dev->id);
+		dev->id = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * Scan one SoC sysfs entry, and fill the devices list from it.
+ * We require to have the uevent file with records: OF_FULLNAME and
+ * OF_COMPATIBLE array (with at least one entry). Otherwise, such device
+ * is skipped.
+ */
+static int
+soc_scan_one(const char *dirname, const char *name)
+{
+	struct rte_soc_device *dev;
+	char *uevent;
+	int ret;
+
+	uevent = dev_read_uevent(dirname);
+	if (uevent == NULL)
+		return -1;
+
+	if (uevent[0] == '\0') {
+		/* ignore directory without uevent file */
+		free(uevent);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	dev = malloc(sizeof(*dev) + strlen(name) + 1);
+	if (dev == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "Failed to alloc memory for %s\n", name);
+		free(uevent);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	memset(dev, 0, sizeof(*dev));
+	dev->addr.name = (char *) (dev + 1);
+	strcpy(dev->addr.name, name);
+
+	ret = dev_parse_uevent(dev, uevent);
+	if (ret)
+		goto fail;
+	free(uevent); /* not needed anymore */
+
+	/* device is valid, add in list (sorted) */
+	if (TAILQ_EMPTY(&soc_device_list)) {
+		TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_device_list, dev, next);
+	} else {
+		struct rte_soc_device *dev2;
+
+		TAILQ_FOREACH(dev2, &soc_device_list, next) {
+			ret = rte_eal_compare_soc_addr(&dev->addr, &dev2->addr);
+			if (ret > 0)
+				continue;
+
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				TAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(dev2, dev, next);
+			} else { /* already registered */
+				dev_content_free(dev2);
+				dev2->addr.fdt_path = dev->addr.fdt_path;
+				dev2->id = dev->id;
+				free(dev);
+			}
+			return 0;
+		}
+		TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&soc_device_list, dev, next);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+fail:
+	free(uevent);
+	dev_content_free(dev);
+	free(dev);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int
+rte_eal_soc_scan(void)
+{
+	struct dirent *e;
+	DIR *dir;
+	char dirname[PATH_MAX];
+
+	dir = opendir(soc_get_sysfs_path());
+	if (dir == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): opendir failed: %s\n",
+			__func__, strerror(errno));
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	while ((e = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
+		if (e->d_name[0] == '.')
+			continue;
+
+		snprintf(dirname, sizeof(dirname), "%s/%s",
+				soc_get_sysfs_path(), e->d_name);
+		if (soc_scan_one(dirname, e->d_name) < 0)
+			goto error;
+	}
+	closedir(dir);
+	return 0;
+
+error:
+	closedir(dir);
+	return -1;
+}
+
 /* Init the SoC EAL subsystem */
 int
 rte_eal_soc_init(void)