[dpdk-dev,v2] test: fix mempool perf test enq_count wraparound of 32-bit uint
Commit Message
recent CPU's can easily wrap around a 32-bit unsigned int in
the mempool perf test. Increase to a 64-bit uint.
v2: change from %lu to %"PRIu64"
Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi David,
On 05/26/2016 04:15 PM, David Hunt wrote:
> recent CPU's can easily wrap around a 32-bit unsigned int in
> the mempool perf test. Increase to a 64-bit uint.
>
> v2: change from %lu to %"PRIu64"
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > recent CPU's can easily wrap around a 32-bit unsigned int in
> > the mempool perf test. Increase to a 64-bit uint.
> >
> > v2: change from %lu to %"PRIu64"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Applied, thanks
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static unsigned n_keep;
/* number of enqueues / dequeues */
struct mempool_test_stats {
- unsigned enq_count;
+ uint64_t enq_count;
} __rte_cache_aligned;
static struct mempool_test_stats stats[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static int
launch_cores(unsigned cores)
{
unsigned lcore_id;
- unsigned rate;
+ uint64_t rate;
int ret;
unsigned cores_save = cores;
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ launch_cores(unsigned cores)
for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++)
rate += (stats[lcore_id].enq_count / TIME_S);
- printf("rate_persec=%u\n", rate);
+ printf("rate_persec=%"PRIu64"\n", rate);
return 0;
}