[dpdk-dev,10/10] eal: no need for E_RTE_NO_TAILQ anymore
Commit Message
There is no remaining reference to this errno.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
---
app/test/test_errno.c | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_errno.c | 2 --
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_errno.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ test_errno(void)
/* use a small selection of standard errors for testing */
int std_errs[] = {EAGAIN, EBADF, EACCES, EINTR, EINVAL};
/* test ALL registered RTE error codes for overlap */
- int rte_errs[] = {E_RTE_SECONDARY, E_RTE_NO_CONFIG, E_RTE_NO_TAILQ};
+ int rte_errs[] = {E_RTE_SECONDARY, E_RTE_NO_CONFIG};
unsigned i;
rte_errno = 0;
@@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ rte_strerror(int errnum)
return "Invalid call in secondary process";
case E_RTE_NO_CONFIG:
return "Missing rte_config structure";
- case E_RTE_NO_TAILQ:
- return "No TAILQ initialised";
default:
strerror_r(errnum, RTE_PER_LCORE(retval), RETVAL_SZ);
}
@@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ enum {
E_RTE_SECONDARY, /**< Operation not allowed in secondary processes */
E_RTE_NO_CONFIG, /**< Missing rte_config */
- E_RTE_NO_TAILQ, /**< Uninitialised TAILQ */
RTE_MAX_ERRNO /**< Max RTE error number */
};