[00/13] net/ionic: miscellaneous fixes and improvements

Message ID 20240202193238.62669-1-andrew.boyer@amd.com (mailing list archive)
Headers
Series net/ionic: miscellaneous fixes and improvements |

Message

Andrew Boyer Feb. 2, 2024, 7:32 p.m. UTC
  This patchset provides miscellaneous fixes and improvements for
the net/ionic driver used by AMD Pensando devices.

Akshay Dorwat (1):
  net/ionic: fix RSS query routine

Andrew Boyer (8):
  net/ionic: add stat for completion queue entries processed
  net/ionic: increase max supported MTU to 9750 bytes
  net/ionic: don't auto-enable Rx scatter-gather a second time
  net/ionic: replace non-standard type in structure definition
  net/ionic: fix device close sequence to avoid crash
  net/ionic: optimize device close operation
  net/ionic: optimize device stop operation
  net/ionic: optimize device start operation

Brad Larson (1):
  net/ionic: add flexible firmware xstat counters

Neel Patel (2):
  net/ionic: fix missing volatile type for cqe pointers
  net/ionic: memcpy descriptors when using Q-in-CMB

Vamsi Krishna Atluri (1):
  net/ionic: report 1G and 200G link speeds when applicable

 drivers/net/ionic/ionic.h             |   3 +
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_dev.c         |   9 +-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_dev.h         |   8 +-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_dev_pci.c     |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_ethdev.c      |  81 ++++++--
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_if.h          |  70 +++----
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_lif.c         | 288 +++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_lif.h         |  19 +-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_main.c        |  17 +-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_rxtx.c        | 160 ++++++++++----
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_rxtx.h        |  80 ++++++-
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_rxtx_sg.c     |  28 +--
 drivers/net/ionic/ionic_rxtx_simple.c |  28 +--
 13 files changed, 550 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Patrick Robb Feb. 5, 2024, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #1
Recheck-request: iol-intel-Functional

I saw this failed in CI testing for the DTS MTU_Update test but suspect it
was an infra failure as it happened across 3 distinct patches in a short
span of time. So, triggering a retest.
  
Andrew Boyer Feb. 5, 2024, 7:41 p.m. UTC | #2
On Feb 5, 2024, at 1:44 PM, Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:

Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.

Recheck-request: iol-intel-Functional

I saw this failed in CI testing for the DTS MTU_Update test but suspect it was an infra failure as it happened across 3 distinct patches in a short span of time. So, triggering a retest.

I thought I saw another patchset hit the same failure that day.

-Andrew