get:
Show a patch.

patch:
Update a patch.

put:
Update a patch.

GET /api/patches/74317/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 74317,
    "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/74317/?format=api",
    "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1594980877-26540-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com/",
    "project": {
        "id": 1,
        "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/projects/1/?format=api",
        "name": "DPDK",
        "link_name": "dpdk",
        "list_id": "dev.dpdk.org",
        "list_email": "dev@dpdk.org",
        "web_url": "http://core.dpdk.org",
        "scm_url": "git://dpdk.org/dpdk",
        "webscm_url": "http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk",
        "list_archive_url": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev",
        "list_archive_url_format": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/{}",
        "commit_url_format": ""
    },
    "msgid": "<1594980877-26540-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>",
    "list_archive_url": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/1594980877-26540-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com",
    "date": "2020-07-17T10:14:35",
    "name": "[v10,1/3] doc: add optimizations using C11 atomic builtins",
    "commit_ref": null,
    "pull_url": null,
    "state": "accepted",
    "archived": true,
    "hash": "5580822c46586b5a9a734e149fd3a1bfadce3632",
    "submitter": {
        "id": 833,
        "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/people/833/?format=api",
        "name": "Phil Yang",
        "email": "phil.yang@arm.com"
    },
    "delegate": {
        "id": 24651,
        "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/users/24651/?format=api",
        "username": "dmarchand",
        "first_name": "David",
        "last_name": "Marchand",
        "email": "david.marchand@redhat.com"
    },
    "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1594980877-26540-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com/mbox/",
    "series": [
        {
            "id": 11124,
            "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/series/11124/?format=api",
            "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=11124",
            "date": "2020-07-17T10:14:34",
            "name": "generic rte atomic APIs deprecate proposal",
            "version": 10,
            "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/series/11124/mbox/"
        }
    ],
    "comments": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/74317/comments/",
    "check": "success",
    "checks": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/74317/checks/",
    "tags": {},
    "related": [],
    "headers": {
        "Return-Path": "<dev-bounces@dpdk.org>",
        "X-Original-To": "patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org",
        "Delivered-To": "patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org",
        "Received": [
            "from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])\n\tby inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23703A053D;\n\tFri, 17 Jul 2020 12:15:21 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671951BFE5;\n\tFri, 17 Jul 2020 12:15:16 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])\n by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8F51BFD4\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:15:15 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])\n by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AC51045;\n Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:15:15 -0700 (PDT)",
            "from phil-VirtualBox.shanghai.arm.com\n (phil-VirtualBox.shanghai.arm.com [10.169.108.167])\n by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E0A0F3F66E;\n Fri, 17 Jul 2020 03:15:10 -0700 (PDT)"
        ],
        "From": "Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>",
        "To": "thomas@monjalon.net,\n\tdev@dpdk.org",
        "Cc": "david.marchand@redhat.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com,\n Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jerinj@marvell.com,\n konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Ola.Liljedahl@arm.com,\n bruce.richardson@intel.com, Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com,\n Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,\n Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>",
        "Date": "Fri, 17 Jul 2020 18:14:35 +0800",
        "Message-Id": "<1594980877-26540-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>",
        "X-Mailer": "git-send-email 2.7.4",
        "In-Reply-To": "<1594980877-26540-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>",
        "References": "<1594962519-20619-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>\n <1594980877-26540-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>",
        "Subject": "[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/3] doc: add optimizations using C11 atomic\n\tbuiltins",
        "X-BeenThere": "dev@dpdk.org",
        "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.15",
        "Precedence": "list",
        "List-Id": "DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>",
        "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,\n <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>",
        "List-Archive": "<http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>",
        "List-Post": "<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>",
        "List-Help": "<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>",
        "List-Subscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,\n <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>",
        "Errors-To": "dev-bounces@dpdk.org",
        "Sender": "\"dev\" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>"
    },
    "content": "Add information about possible optimizations using C11 atomic builtins.\n\nSigned-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>\nSigned-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>\nReviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>\n---\n doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++-\n 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)",
    "diff": "diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst\nindex 849f63e..8dd5439 100644\n--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst\n+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.rst\n@@ -167,7 +167,13 @@ but with the added cost of lower throughput.\n Locks and Atomic Operations\n ---------------------------\n \n-Atomic operations imply a lock prefix before the instruction,\n+This section describes some key considerations when using locks and atomic\n+operations in the DPDK environment.\n+\n+Locks\n+~~~~~\n+\n+On x86, atomic operations imply a lock prefix before the instruction,\n causing the processor's LOCK# signal to be asserted during execution of the following instruction.\n This has a big impact on performance in a multicore environment.\n \n@@ -176,6 +182,57 @@ It can often be replaced by other solutions like per-lcore variables.\n Also, some locking techniques are more efficient than others.\n For instance, the Read-Copy-Update (RCU) algorithm can frequently replace simple rwlocks.\n \n+Atomic Operations: Use C11 Atomic Builtins\n+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n+\n+DPDK generic rte_atomic operations are implemented by __sync builtins. These\n+__sync builtins result in full barriers on aarch64, which are unnecessary\n+in many use cases. They can be replaced by __atomic builtins that conform to\n+the C11 memory model and provide finer memory order control.\n+\n+So replacing the rte_atomic operations with __atomic builtins might improve\n+performance for aarch64 machines.\n+\n+Some typical optimization cases are listed below:\n+\n+Atomicity\n+^^^^^^^^^\n+\n+Some use cases require atomicity alone, the ordering of the memory operations\n+does not matter. For example, the packet statistics counters need to be\n+incremented atomically but do not need any particular memory ordering.\n+So, RELAXED memory ordering is sufficient.\n+\n+One-way Barrier\n+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n+\n+Some use cases allow for memory reordering in one way while requiring memory\n+ordering in the other direction.\n+\n+For example, the memory operations before the spinlock lock are allowed to\n+move to the critical section, but the memory operations in the critical section\n+are not allowed to move above the lock. In this case, the full memory barrier\n+in the compare-and-swap operation can be replaced with ACQUIRE memory order.\n+On the other hand, the memory operations after the spinlock unlock are allowed\n+to move to the critical section, but the memory operations in the critical\n+section are not allowed to move below the unlock. So the full barrier in the\n+store operation can use RELEASE memory order.\n+\n+Reader-Writer Concurrency\n+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\n+\n+Lock-free reader-writer concurrency is one of the common use cases in DPDK.\n+\n+The payload or the data that the writer wants to communicate to the reader,\n+can be written with RELAXED memory order. However, the guard variable should\n+be written with RELEASE memory order. This ensures that the store to guard\n+variable is observable only after the store to payload is observable.\n+\n+Correspondingly, on the reader side, the guard variable should be read\n+with ACQUIRE memory order. The payload or the data the writer communicated,\n+can be read with RELAXED memory order. This ensures that, if the store to\n+guard variable is observable, the store to payload is also observable.\n+\n Coding Considerations\n ---------------------\n \n",
    "prefixes": [
        "v10",
        "1/3"
    ]
}