Patch Detail
get:
Show a patch.
patch:
Update a patch.
put:
Update a patch.
GET /api/patches/68068/?format=api
{ "id": 68068, "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/68068/?format=api", "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20200409172502.1693-7-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com/", "project": { "id": 1, "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/projects/1/?format=api", "name": "DPDK", "link_name": "dpdk", "list_id": "dev.dpdk.org", "list_email": "dev@dpdk.org", "web_url": "http://core.dpdk.org", "scm_url": "git://dpdk.org/dpdk", "webscm_url": "http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk", "list_archive_url": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev", "list_archive_url_format": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/{}", "commit_url_format": "" }, "msgid": "<20200409172502.1693-7-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>", "list_archive_url": "https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20200409172502.1693-7-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com", "date": "2020-04-09T17:24:55", "name": "[v3,06/13] app/test: add rte security session update tests", "commit_ref": null, "pull_url": null, "state": "accepted", "archived": true, "hash": "09b4f7b998e48b493f787dce24f298d8e4fcda43", "submitter": { "id": 1628, "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/people/1628/?format=api", "name": "Lukasz Wojciechowski", "email": "l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com" }, "delegate": { "id": 6690, "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/users/6690/?format=api", "username": "akhil", "first_name": "akhil", "last_name": "goyal", "email": "gakhil@marvell.com" }, "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20200409172502.1693-7-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com/mbox/", "series": [ { "id": 9272, "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/series/9272/?format=api", "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=9272", "date": "2020-04-09T17:24:49", "name": "Fixes and unit tests for librte_security", "version": 3, "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/series/9272/mbox/" } ], "comments": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/68068/comments/", "check": "success", "checks": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/patches/68068/checks/", "tags": {}, "related": [], "headers": { "Return-Path": "<dev-bounces@dpdk.org>", "X-Original-To": "patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org", "Delivered-To": "patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org", "Received": [ "from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])\n\tby inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08931A0597;\n\tThu, 9 Apr 2020 19:26:28 +0200 (CEST)", "from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BFD1D405;\n\tThu, 9 Apr 2020 19:25:42 +0200 (CEST)", "from mailout2.w1.samsung.com (mailout2.w1.samsung.com\n [210.118.77.12]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A11C2F3\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:25:34 +0200 (CEST)", "from eucas1p1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.206])\n by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id\n 20200409172534euoutp02097379ca2535b4e35b25faab12f5ae7b~ENrh6v6LJ2095420954euoutp02l\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:25:34 +0000 (GMT)", "from eusmges1new.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.242]) by\n eucas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id\n 20200409172534eucas1p1cddf0003b30be0883964c81cc2157caf~ENrhsH2V40985509855eucas1p1y\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:25:34 +0000 (GMT)", "from eucas1p2.samsung.com ( [182.198.249.207]) by\n eusmges1new.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id B3.F2.61286.E8A5F8E5; Thu, 9\n Apr 2020 18:25:34 +0100 (BST)", "from eusmtrp1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.138]) by\n eucas1p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id\n 20200409172533eucas1p252ed0cac1689b067a83589a0665c9033~ENrhNfuD30102501025eucas1p2m\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:25:33 +0000 (GMT)", "from eusmgms2.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.180]) by\n eusmtrp1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id\n 20200409172533eusmtrp1bd51c8bea937c7e839e3c81af6221f6e~ENrhM-VAo2463624636eusmtrp1I\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:25:33 +0000 (GMT)", "from eusmtip1.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.221]) by\n eusmgms2.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id B4.48.07950.D8A5F8E5; Thu, 9\n Apr 2020 18:25:33 +0100 (BST)", "from localhost.localdomain (unknown [106.210.88.70]) by\n eusmtip1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id\n 20200409172533eusmtip17bdd34a42266d579550e1c30dd70d302~ENrg274x60696506965eusmtip1R\n for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:25:33 +0000 (GMT)" ], "DKIM-Filter": "OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.w1.samsung.com\n 20200409172534euoutp02097379ca2535b4e35b25faab12f5ae7b~ENrh6v6LJ2095420954euoutp02l", "DKIM-Signature": "v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com;\n s=mail20170921; t=1586453134;\n bh=UU/wxp6Tjzo1nyxDa7i6/6DQF7d/5k1o9xF1LLYCsYU=;\n h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;\n b=RusurEuNirc/Xf90rwm9ZGXF+EaUMXapiaaOn/hIxkYwjUsGRVYPVl0eEi8zqoR83\n OuEtcYWhRDrUVGjh2m9mcvz/OKm70DKrLQRt4Cw4Fb0BVY6/Fzb4THRoHNpvstKR0h\n 3qv8DhNooRJP4qXfm08f6wEwsTZWsnIEqFSPRkLs=", "X-AuditID": "cbfec7f2-ef1ff7000001ef66-33-5e8f5a8e0a9d", "From": "Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>", "To": "", "Cc": "dev@dpdk.org", "Date": "Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:24:55 +0200", "Message-Id": "<20200409172502.1693-7-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>", "X-Mailer": "git-send-email 2.17.1", "In-Reply-To": "<20200409172502.1693-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>", "X-Brightmail-Tracker": [ "\n H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrNIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWy7djP87p9Uf1xBqd3SFm8+7SdyYHR49eC\n pawBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGROOXWQq2OheMXXhV9YGxl02XYwcHBICJhL/tnp2MXJxCAms\n YJTovHiCFcJpZ5J4fPELM4TTxiSx59Jm9i5GTrCO7ptbmSASyxklJjVfZ4Sr+jh5JytIFZuA\n rcSRmV/BbBEBFomV37+zgNjMAgISj+89A4sLC3hKPNi2hxHEZhFQlbjz9BQTiM0r4CIx7c8f\n Voht8hKrNxxgBrE5BVwlbh2/BHaShMAaNokDXyZCneQiceLzXjYIW1ji1fEtUHEZidOTe1gg\n GrYxSlz9/ZMRwtnPKHG9dwVUlbXE4X+/2UDBwSygKbF+lz5E2FHi17WVLJBQ4pO48VYQ4gE+\n iUnbpjNDhHklOtqEIKr1JJ72TGWEWftn7RMWCNtD4tbBo9Awvcwo8XnhUZYJjPKzEJYtYGRc\n xSieWlqcm55abJiXWq5XnJhbXJqXrpecn7uJERjFp/8d/7SD8eulpEOMAhyMSjy8Bgz9cUKs\n iWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEeL2beuOEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ8xovehkrJJCeWJKanZpa\n kFoEk2Xi4JRqYJQ/0b3Y9nFwnsYz4VzrRvaUlCy1BM3XIaYtUk82KLLOFXBfUX37eNstMY0t\n /+coTH19REnPjNlBS8rKxlwqRv/bTvMFEvWb2KvOB9Wtv3jQQ88p7tLpOQ5H5D6rLJbZ73Kw\n q2H5rpgVUzMluX8vett19sipz6yXwhcd65i1eumbcxn3D3MJFSqxFGckGmoxFxUnAgDxenUT\n 3gIAAA==", "\n H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xu7q9Uf1xBl97TC3efdrO5MDo8WvB\n UtYAxig9m6L80pJUhYz84hJbpWhDCyM9Q0sLPSMTSz1DY/NYKyNTJX07m5TUnMyy1CJ9uwS9\n jAnHLjIVbHSvmLrwK2sD4y6bLkZODgkBE4num1uZuhi5OIQEljJKTHzznaWLkQMoISPx4ZIA\n RI2wxJ9rXWwQNS1MEj/v/WQGSbAJ2EocmfmVFcQWEWCRWPkdpJeTg1lAQOLxvWdgcWEBT4kH\n 2/YwgtgsAqoSd56eYgKxeQVcJKb9+cMKsUBeYvWGA2AzOQVcJW4dvwRmCwnUS9zu+sM4gZFv\n ASPDKkaR1NLi3PTcYiO94sTc4tK8dL3k/NxNjMCA2nbs55YdjF3vgg8xCnAwKvHwGjD0xwmx\n JpYVV+YeYpTgYFYS4fVu6o0T4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xGgKdNREZinR5HxgsOeVxBuaGppb\n WBqaG5sbm1koifN2CByMERJITyxJzU5NLUgtgulj4uCUamBkWyS8iPUgn6uO3KuZcxfKyjza\n eCvzxKqGT5OW5p1TfS2+nCN/ja+JuvazZ9+P8Dg/z/+hsIdtvu0S42mBtcFhFYyT15Q9tcur\n kVm5dULof8+Fwr7L3s3LPHqa5+lEE5mHRqkxZ10FX3put481ySnknD7j8wvV9+cmvs4PbI5L\n Fg1PcPIq/2yoxFKckWioxVxUnAgAFTeBnD4CAAA=" ], "X-CMS-MailID": "20200409172533eucas1p252ed0cac1689b067a83589a0665c9033", "X-Msg-Generator": "CA", "Content-Type": "text/plain; charset=\"utf-8\"", "X-RootMTR": "20200409172533eucas1p252ed0cac1689b067a83589a0665c9033", "X-EPHeader": "CA", "CMS-TYPE": "201P", "X-CMS-RootMailID": "20200409172533eucas1p252ed0cac1689b067a83589a0665c9033", "References": "<20200408031351.4288-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>\n <20200409172502.1693-1-l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>\n <CGME20200409172533eucas1p252ed0cac1689b067a83589a0665c9033@eucas1p2.samsung.com>", "Subject": "[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/13] app/test: add rte security session\n\tupdate tests", "X-BeenThere": "dev@dpdk.org", "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.15", "Precedence": "list", "List-Id": "DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>", "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,\n <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>", "List-Archive": "<http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>", "List-Post": "<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>", "List-Help": "<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>", "List-Subscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,\n <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>", "Errors-To": "dev-bounces@dpdk.org", "Sender": "\"dev\" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>" }, "content": "Add unit tests for rte_security_session_update function.\n\nSigned-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>\n---\n app/test/test_security.c | 229 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++\n 1 file changed, 229 insertions(+)", "diff": "diff --git a/app/test/test_security.c b/app/test/test_security.c\nindex 3fc83abae..daaf30b62 100644\n--- a/app/test/test_security.c\n+++ b/app/test/test_security.c\n@@ -238,6 +238,36 @@ mock_session_create(void *device,\n \treturn mock_session_create_exp.ret;\n }\n \n+/**\n+ * session_update mockup\n+ *\n+ * Verified parameters: device, sess, conf.\n+ */\n+static struct mock_session_update_data {\n+\tvoid *device;\n+\tstruct rte_security_session *sess;\n+\tstruct rte_security_session_conf *conf;\n+\n+\tint ret;\n+\n+\tint called;\n+\tint failed;\n+} mock_session_update_exp = {NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0};\n+\n+static int\n+mock_session_update(void *device,\n+\t\tstruct rte_security_session *sess,\n+\t\tstruct rte_security_session_conf *conf)\n+{\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.called++;\n+\n+\tMOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_update_exp, device);\n+\tMOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_update_exp, sess);\n+\tMOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_update_exp, conf);\n+\n+\treturn mock_session_update_exp.ret;\n+}\n+\n /**\n * session_destroy mockup\n *\n@@ -278,6 +308,7 @@ struct rte_security_ops empty_ops = { NULL };\n */\n struct rte_security_ops mock_ops = {\n \t.session_create = mock_session_create,\n+\t.session_update = mock_session_update,\n \t.session_destroy = mock_session_destroy,\n };\n \n@@ -300,6 +331,7 @@ static struct security_testsuite_params {\n /**\n * struct security_unittest_params defines parameters initialized\n * for every test case. The parameters are initialized in ut_setup\n+ * or ut_setup_with_session (depending on the testcase)\n * and released in ut_teardown.\n * The instance of this structure is stored in unittest_params variable.\n */\n@@ -368,9 +400,11 @@ ut_setup(void)\n \tut_params->sess = NULL;\n \n \tmock_session_create_exp.called = 0;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.called = 0;\n \tmock_session_destroy_exp.called = 0;\n \n \tmock_session_create_exp.failed = 0;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.failed = 0;\n \tmock_session_destroy_exp.failed = 0;\n \n \treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n@@ -381,6 +415,7 @@ ut_setup(void)\n * created with rte_security_session_create and stored in test case parameters.\n * It's used both to release sessions created in test cases' bodies\n * which are assigned to ut_params->sess\n+ * as well as sessions created in ut_setup_with_session.\n */\n static int\n destroy_session_with_check(void)\n@@ -416,6 +451,46 @@ ut_teardown(void)\n \tdestroy_session_with_check();\n }\n \n+/**\n+ * ut_setup_with_session initializes test case parameters by\n+ * - calling standard ut_setup,\n+ * - creating a session that can be used in test case.\n+ */\n+static int\n+ut_setup_with_session(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\tstruct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;\n+\tstruct rte_security_session *sess;\n+\n+\tint ret = ut_setup();\n+\tif (ret != TEST_SUCCESS)\n+\t\treturn ret;\n+\n+\tmock_session_create_exp.device = NULL;\n+\tmock_session_create_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf;\n+\tmock_session_create_exp.mp = ts_params->session_mpool;\n+\tmock_session_create_exp.ret = 0;\n+\n+\tsess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf,\n+\t\t\tts_params->session_mpool);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(rte_security_session_create,\n+\t\t\tsess);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess,\n+\t\t\t\"Expecting session_create to be called with %p sess\"\n+\t\t\t\" parameter, but it's called %p sess parameter\",\n+\t\t\tsess, mock_session_create_exp.sess);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 1);\n+\n+\t/*\n+\t * Store created session in test case parameters, so it can be released\n+\t * after test case in ut_teardown by destroy_session_with_check.\n+\t */\n+\tut_params->sess = sess;\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n \n /**\n * Test functions\n@@ -642,6 +717,145 @@ test_session_create_success(void)\n }\n \n \n+/**\n+ * rte_security_session_update tests\n+ */\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update with NULL instance\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_inv_context(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(NULL, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -EINVAL, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 0);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update with invalid\n+ * security operations structure (NULL)\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_inv_context_ops(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\tut_params->ctx.ops = NULL;\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -EINVAL, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 0);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update with empty\n+ * security operations\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_inv_context_ops_fun(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\tut_params->ctx.ops = &empty_ops;\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -ENOTSUP, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 0);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update with NULL conf parameter\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_inv_configuration(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\tNULL);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -EINVAL, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 0);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update with NULL sess parameter\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_inv_session(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, NULL,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -EINVAL, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 0);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update when session_update\n+ * security operation fails\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_ops_failure(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.device = NULL;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.sess = ut_params->sess;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.ret = -1;\t/* Return failure status. */\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, -1, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 1);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+/**\n+ * Test execution of rte_security_session_update in successful execution path\n+ */\n+static int\n+test_session_update_success(void)\n+{\n+\tstruct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;\n+\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.device = NULL;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.sess = ut_params->sess;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf;\n+\tmock_session_update_exp.ret = 0;\t/* Return success status. */\n+\n+\tint ret = rte_security_session_update(&ut_params->ctx, ut_params->sess,\n+\t\t\t&ut_params->conf);\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_update,\n+\t\t\tret, 0, \"%d\");\n+\tTEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_update_exp, 1);\n+\n+\treturn TEST_SUCCESS;\n+}\n+\n+\n /**\n * Declaration of testcases\n */\n@@ -667,6 +881,21 @@ static struct unit_test_suite security_testsuite = {\n \t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,\n \t\t\t\ttest_session_create_success),\n \n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_inv_context),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_inv_context_ops),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_inv_context_ops_fun),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_inv_configuration),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_inv_session),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_ops_failure),\n+\t\tTEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_with_session, ut_teardown,\n+\t\t\t\ttest_session_update_success),\n+\n \t\tTEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */\n \t}\n };\n", "prefixes": [ "v3", "06/13" ] }