Show a cover letter.

GET /api/covers/52591/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 52591,
    "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/covers/52591/?format=api",
    "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/52591/",
    "project": {
        "id": 1,
        "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/projects/1/?format=api",
        "name": "DPDK",
        "link_name": "dpdk",
        "list_id": "dev.dpdk.org",
        "list_email": "dev@dpdk.org",
        "web_url": "http://core.dpdk.org",
        "scm_url": "git://dpdk.org/dpdk",
        "webscm_url": "http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk"
    },
    "msgid": "<1554900829-16180-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>",
    "date": "2019-04-10T12:53:45",
    "name": "[0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd",
    "submitter": {
        "id": 1173,
        "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/people/1173/?format=api",
        "name": "David Marchand",
        "email": "david.marchand@redhat.com"
    },
    "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/cover/52591/mbox/",
    "series": [
        {
            "id": 4240,
            "url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/series/4240/?format=api",
            "web_url": "http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=4240",
            "date": "2019-04-10T12:53:45",
            "name": "lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd",
            "version": 1,
            "mbox": "http://patches.dpdk.org/series/4240/mbox/"
        }
    ],
    "comments": "http://patches.dpdk.org/api/covers/52591/comments/",
    "headers": {
        "List-Id": "DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>",
        "From": "David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>",
        "List-Help": "<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>",
        "Date": "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:53:45 +0200",
        "X-BeenThere": "dev@dpdk.org",
        "X-Mailman-Version": "2.1.15",
        "Delivered-To": "patchwork@dpdk.org",
        "Cc": "chas3@att.com,\n\tp.oltarzewski@gmail.com",
        "To": "dev@dpdk.org",
        "Errors-To": "dev-bounces@dpdk.org",
        "Sender": "\"dev\" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>",
        "Return-Path": "<dev-bounces@dpdk.org>",
        "List-Subscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,\n\t<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>",
        "List-Post": "<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>",
        "Received": [
            "from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])\n\tby dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE41B0FC;\n\tWed, 10 Apr 2019 14:54:05 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])\n\tby dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3F7CDA\n\tfor <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:54:03 +0200 (CEST)",
            "from smtp.corp.redhat.com\n\t(int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16])\n\t(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\n\t(No client certificate requested)\n\tby mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E3503084212;\n\tWed, 10 Apr 2019 12:54:03 +0000 (UTC)",
            "from dmarchan.remote.csb (ovpn-204-129.brq.redhat.com\n\t[10.40.204.129])\n\tby smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E184B5C8BC;\n\tWed, 10 Apr 2019 12:54:00 +0000 (UTC)"
        ],
        "List-Archive": "<http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>",
        "X-Scanned-By": "MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16",
        "Subject": "[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] lacp rx/tx handlers fixes for bonding pmd",
        "Message-Id": "<1554900829-16180-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>",
        "Precedence": "list",
        "X-Greylist": "Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16\n\t(mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:54:03 +0000 (UTC)",
        "List-Unsubscribe": "<https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,\n\t<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>",
        "X-Original-To": "patchwork@dpdk.org"
    },
    "content": "Another series with focus on the fast/normal rx/tx handlers for 802.3ad.\n\nThe first two patches make sure that the rx (resp. tx) fast and normal\nhandlers are equivalent.\n\nThe third one will most likely have an impact on performance which I\ntried to mitigate with the last one. However, I have no benchmark to\nback those patches and I did not test those thoroughly, so they are\nmore like RFC patches but sending anyway."
}