[v4,5/5] bpf: replace use of VLA

Message ID 20251104160843.304044-6-stephen@networkplumber.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers
Series BPF enhancements |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/loongarch-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/loongarch-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/iol-mellanox-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-marvell-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/intel-Functional success Functional PASS
ci/iol-sample-apps-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/github-robot-post success github post: success
ci/iol-unit-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/aws-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Stephen Hemminger Nov. 4, 2025, 4:07 p.m. UTC
Variable length arrays are extension not required in C standard
and not available in Windows.
Use alloca() instead of variable length array.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Konstantin Ananyev Nov. 6, 2025, 7:26 a.m. UTC | #1
> Variable length arrays are extension not required in C standard
> and not available in Windows.
> Use alloca() instead of variable length array.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> index 087ac0f244..5007f6aef5 100644
> --- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> +++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ apply_filter(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], const uint64_t rc[],
> uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, j, k;
> -	struct rte_mbuf *dr[num];
> +	struct rte_mbuf **dr = alloca(num * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *));
> 
>  	for (i = 0, j = 0, k = 0; i != num; i++) {
> 
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ pkt_filter_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf
> *mb[], uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i;
> -	void *dp[num];
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	void **dp = alloca(num * sizeof(void *));
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++)
>  		dp[i] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb[i], void *);
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ pkt_filter_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct rte_mbuf
> *mb[],
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, n;
>  	void *dp;
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	n = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static inline uint32_t
>  pkt_filter_mb_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	rte_bpf_exec_burst(bpf, (void **)mb, rc, num);
>  	return apply_filter(mb, rc, num, drop);
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ pkt_filter_mb_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct
> rte_mbuf *mb[],
>  	uint32_t num, uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, n;
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	n = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {
> --

Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
 

> 2.51.0
  
Marat Khalili Nov. 7, 2025, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Tuesday 4 November 2025 16:08
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] bpf: replace use of VLA
> 
> Variable length arrays are extension not required in C standard
> and not available in Windows.
> Use alloca() instead of variable length array.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> index 087ac0f244..5007f6aef5 100644
> --- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> +++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ apply_filter(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], const uint64_t rc[], uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, j, k;
> -	struct rte_mbuf *dr[num];
> +	struct rte_mbuf **dr = alloca(num * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *));
> 
>  	for (i = 0, j = 0, k = 0; i != num; i++) {
> 
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ pkt_filter_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i;
> -	void *dp[num];
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	void **dp = alloca(num * sizeof(void *));
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++)
>  		dp[i] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb[i], void *);
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ pkt_filter_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct rte_mbuf *mb[],
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, n;
>  	void *dp;
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	n = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static inline uint32_t
>  pkt_filter_mb_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num,
>  	uint32_t drop)
>  {
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	rte_bpf_exec_burst(bpf, (void **)mb, rc, num);
>  	return apply_filter(mb, rc, num, drop);
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ pkt_filter_mb_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct rte_mbuf *mb[],
>  	uint32_t num, uint32_t drop)
>  {
>  	uint32_t i, n;
> -	uint64_t rc[num];
> +	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
> 
>  	n = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {
> --
> 2.51.0

Reviewed-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili@huawei.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
index 087ac0f244..5007f6aef5 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@  apply_filter(struct rte_mbuf *mb[], const uint64_t rc[], uint32_t num,
 	uint32_t drop)
 {
 	uint32_t i, j, k;
-	struct rte_mbuf *dr[num];
+	struct rte_mbuf **dr = alloca(num * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *));
 
 	for (i = 0, j = 0, k = 0; i != num; i++) {
 
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@  pkt_filter_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num,
 	uint32_t drop)
 {
 	uint32_t i;
-	void *dp[num];
-	uint64_t rc[num];
+	void **dp = alloca(num * sizeof(void *));
+	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
 
 	for (i = 0; i != num; i++)
 		dp[i] = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mb[i], void *);
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@  pkt_filter_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct rte_mbuf *mb[],
 {
 	uint32_t i, n;
 	void *dp;
-	uint64_t rc[num];
+	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
 
 	n = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@  static inline uint32_t
 pkt_filter_mb_vm(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, struct rte_mbuf *mb[], uint32_t num,
 	uint32_t drop)
 {
-	uint64_t rc[num];
+	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
 
 	rte_bpf_exec_burst(bpf, (void **)mb, rc, num);
 	return apply_filter(mb, rc, num, drop);
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@  pkt_filter_mb_jit(const struct rte_bpf_jit *jit, struct rte_mbuf *mb[],
 	uint32_t num, uint32_t drop)
 {
 	uint32_t i, n;
-	uint64_t rc[num];
+	uint64_t *rc = alloca(num * sizeof(uint64_t));
 
 	n = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i != num; i++) {