[v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library tag

  Updates the tag of Arm IPsec-MB library to SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12
in snow3g and zuc documentation.

Signed-off-by: Jack Bond-Preston <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
---
 .mailmap                         | 1 +
 doc/guides/cryptodevs/snow3g.rst | 2 +-
 doc/guides/cryptodevs/zuc.rst    | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library tag
> 
> Updates the tag of Arm IPsec-MB library to SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12
> in snow3g and zuc documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jack Bond-Preston <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
Is this tag verified in CI?
  

We are rebuilding from this tag right now. I know the IPSEC update is
now postponed until after 24.03, but once this install is done, do you
want me to issue retests for all the recent patches which had failed
for ARM on this library previously? Then I guess it will be verified
as you say.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:50 PM Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library tag
> >
> > Updates the tag of Arm IPsec-MB library to SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12
> > in snow3g and zuc documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jack Bond-Preston <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
> Is this tag verified in CI?
  

> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library
> tag
> 
> We are rebuilding from this tag right now. I know the IPSEC update is
> now postponed until after 24.03, but once this install is done, do you
> want me to issue retests for all the recent patches which had failed
> for ARM on this library previously? Then I guess it will be verified
> as you say.
> 
Yes, IPsec-mb update is postponed.
But, I remember Bryan highlighted an issue in existing library.
Just wanted to check if this tag can be used in the current release or
Are we good without any changes. 

> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 2:50 PM Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library
> tag
> > >
> > > Updates the tag of Arm IPsec-MB library to SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12
> > > in snow3g and zuc documentation.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jack Bond-Preston <jack.bond-preston@foss.arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
> > Is this tag verified in CI?
  

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 4:04 PM Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB library
> > tag
> >
> > We are rebuilding from this tag right now. I know the IPSEC update is
> > now postponed until after 24.03, but once this install is done, do you
> > want me to issue retests for all the recent patches which had failed
> > for ARM on this library previously? Then I guess it will be verified
> > as you say.
> >
> Yes, IPsec-mb update is postponed.
> But, I remember Bryan highlighted an issue in existing library.
> Just wanted to check if this tag can be used in the current release or
> Are we good without any changes.

Okay, triggered a DPDK main "periodic run" on the CI now that we are
running from SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12 and I see it passed. So it looks
like this tag can be used with the current release.

Otherwise, I will take the opportunity to just trigger retests for all
series which failed the crypto tests on ARM in recent weeks, just so
we know whether the new library makes a difference (it should), even
though the new requirement won't go through.
  

> > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v3] doc/ipsec_mb: update Arm IPsec-MB
> library
> > > tag
> > >
> > > We are rebuilding from this tag right now. I know the IPSEC update is
> > > now postponed until after 24.03, but once this install is done, do you
> > > want me to issue retests for all the recent patches which had failed
> > > for ARM on this library previously? Then I guess it will be verified
> > > as you say.
> > >
> > Yes, IPsec-mb update is postponed.
> > But, I remember Bryan highlighted an issue in existing library.
> > Just wanted to check if this tag can be used in the current release or
> > Are we good without any changes.
> 
> Okay, triggered a DPDK main "periodic run" on the CI now that we are
> running from SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12 and I see it passed. So it looks
> like this tag can be used with the current release.
> 
> Otherwise, I will take the opportunity to just trigger retests for all
> series which failed the crypto tests on ARM in recent weeks, just so
> we know whether the new library makes a difference (it should), even
> though the new requirement won't go through.

Thanks Patrick for testing this out.

Applied to dpdk-next-crypto