diff mbox series

[v4] common/sfc: replace out of bounds condition with static_assert

Message ID 20240212054917.12475-1-stephen@networkplumber.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Ferruh Yigit
Headers
Series [v4] common/sfc: replace out of bounds condition with static_assert |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/loongarch-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/loongarch-unit-testing success Unit Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/intel-Functional success Functional PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-abi-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-amd64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-unit-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-compile-arm64-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-broadcom-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-sample-apps-testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Stephen Hemminger Feb. 12, 2024, 5:48 a.m. UTC 
  The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
static_assert like rte_common.h.

The use of null pointer to compute offset is not always a constant
in older versions of clang. Use standard offsetof() instead.

Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/base: fix coding style")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
---
 drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Ferruh Yigit Feb. 12, 2024, 12:09 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 2/12/2024 5:48 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
> using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
> static_assert like rte_common.h.
> 
> The use of null pointer to compute offset is not always a constant
> in older versions of clang. Use standard offsetof() instead.
> 
> Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/base: fix coding style")> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> 

Looks good to me,
unless there is no objection from driver maintainers I will merge it.
Ferruh Yigit Feb. 13, 2024, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 2/12/2024 5:48 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The sfc base code had its own definition of static assertions
> using the out of bound array access hack. Replace it with a
> static_assert like rte_common.h.
> 
> The use of null pointer to compute offset is not always a constant
> in older versions of clang. Use standard offsetof() instead.
> 
> Fixes: f67e4719147d ("net/sfc/base: fix coding style")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> 

Moving ack from previous version:
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
index 3312c2fa8f81..5773cb00b3c7 100644
--- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
+++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx.h
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ 
 #ifndef	_SYS_EFX_H
 #define	_SYS_EFX_H
 
+#include <assert.h>
+
 #include "efx_annote.h"
 #include "efsys.h"
 #include "efx_types.h"
@@ -17,14 +19,20 @@ 
 extern "C" {
 #endif
 
-#define	EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(_cond)		\
-	((void)sizeof (char[(_cond) ? 1 : -1]))
+/*
+ * Triggers an error at compilation time if the condition is false.
+ *
+ * The  { } exists to workaround a bug in clang (#55821)
+ * where it would not handle _Static_assert in a switch case.
+ */
+#define	EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(_cond) \
+	{ static_assert((_cond), #_cond); }
 
 #define	EFX_ARRAY_SIZE(_array)			\
 	(sizeof (_array) / sizeof ((_array)[0]))
 
 #define	EFX_FIELD_OFFSET(_type, _field)		\
-	((size_t)&(((_type *)0)->_field))
+	offsetof(_type, _field)
 
 /* The macro expands divider twice */
 #define	EFX_DIV_ROUND_UP(_n, _d)		(((_n) + (_d) - 1) / (_d))