[v2,2/2] net/mlx5: add support to compare random value
Checks
Commit Message
Add support to use "RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_COMPARE" with
"RTE_FLOW_FIELD_RAMDOM" as an argument.
The random field is supported only when base is an immediate value,
random field cannot be compared with enother field.
Signed-off-by: Michael Baum <michaelba@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
@@ -6686,18 +6686,55 @@ flow_hw_prepend_item(const struct rte_flow_item *items,
return copied_items;
}
-static inline bool
-flow_hw_item_compare_field_supported(enum rte_flow_field_id field)
+static int
+flow_hw_item_compare_field_validate(enum rte_flow_field_id arg_field,
+ enum rte_flow_field_id base_field,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
- switch (field) {
+ switch (arg_field) {
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TAG:
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_META:
+ break;
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_RANDOM:
+ if (base_field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE)
+ return 0;
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
+ NULL,
+ "compare random is supported only with immediate value");
+ default:
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
+ NULL,
+ "compare item argument field is not supported");
+ }
+ switch (base_field) {
case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TAG:
case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_META:
case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE:
- return true;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
+ NULL,
+ "compare item base field is not supported");
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+flow_hw_item_compare_width_supported(enum rte_flow_field_id field)
+{
+ switch (field) {
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_TAG:
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_META:
+ return 32;
+ case RTE_FLOW_FIELD_RANDOM:
+ return 16;
default:
break;
}
- return false;
+ return 0;
}
static int
@@ -6706,6 +6743,7 @@ flow_hw_validate_item_compare(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
{
const struct rte_flow_item_compare *comp_m = item->mask;
const struct rte_flow_item_compare *comp_v = item->spec;
+ int ret;
if (unlikely(!comp_m))
return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
@@ -6717,19 +6755,13 @@ flow_hw_validate_item_compare(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,
"compare item only support full mask");
- if (!flow_hw_item_compare_field_supported(comp_m->a.field) ||
- !flow_hw_item_compare_field_supported(comp_m->b.field))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
- NULL,
- "compare item field not support");
- if (comp_m->a.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE &&
- comp_m->b.field == RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
- NULL,
- "compare between value is not valid");
+ ret = flow_hw_item_compare_field_validate(comp_m->a.field,
+ comp_m->b.field, error);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
if (comp_v) {
+ uint32_t width;
+
if (comp_v->operation != comp_m->operation ||
comp_v->a.field != comp_m->a.field ||
comp_v->b.field != comp_m->b.field)
@@ -6737,7 +6769,9 @@ flow_hw_validate_item_compare(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,
"compare item spec/mask not matching");
- if ((comp_v->width & comp_m->width) != 32)
+ width = flow_hw_item_compare_width_supported(comp_v->a.field);
+ MLX5_ASSERT(width > 0);
+ if ((comp_v->width & comp_m->width) != width)
return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,