[v2] vhost: add IRQ suppression

  Guest notifications offloading, which has been introduced
in v23.07, aims at offloading syscalls out of the datapath.

This patch optimizes the offloading by not offloading the
guest notification for a given virtqueue if one is already
being offloaded by the application.

With a single VDUSE device, we can already see few
notifications being suppressed when doing throughput
testing with Iperf3. We can expect to see much more being
suppressed when the offloading thread is under pressure.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 lib/vhost/vhost.c |  4 ++++
 lib/vhost/vhost.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

On 8/31/23 16:44, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Guest notifications offloading, which has been introduced
> in v23.07, aims at offloading syscalls out of the datapath.
> 
> This patch optimizes the offloading by not offloading the
> guest notification for a given virtqueue if one is already
> being offloaded by the application.
> 
> With a single VDUSE device, we can already see few
> notifications being suppressed when doing throughput
> testing with Iperf3. We can expect to see much more being
> suppressed when the offloading thread is under pressure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
>   lib/vhost/vhost.c |  4 ++++
>   lib/vhost/vhost.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

No functionnal change in the V2, just rebased so that CI can apply.

Maxime
  

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 4:44 PM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Guest notifications offloading, which has been introduced
> in v23.07, aims at offloading syscalls out of the datapath.
>
> This patch optimizes the offloading by not offloading the
> guest notification for a given virtqueue if one is already
> being offloaded by the application.
>
> With a single VDUSE device, we can already see few
> notifications being suppressed when doing throughput
> testing with Iperf3. We can expect to see much more being
> suppressed when the offloading thread is under pressure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
>  lib/vhost/vhost.c |  4 ++++
>  lib/vhost/vhost.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.c b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> index eb6309b681..7794f29c18 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ static const struct vhost_vq_stats_name_off vhost_vq_stat_strings[] = {
>                 stats.guest_notifications_offloaded)},
>         {"guest_notifications_error", offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue,
>                 stats.guest_notifications_error)},
> +       {"guest_notifications_suppressed", offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue,
> +               stats.guest_notifications_suppressed)},
>         {"iotlb_hits",             offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.iotlb_hits)},
>         {"iotlb_misses",           offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.iotlb_misses)},
>         {"inflight_submitted",     offsetof(struct vhost_virtqueue, stats.inflight_submitted)},
> @@ -1516,6 +1518,8 @@ rte_vhost_notify_guest(int vid, uint16_t queue_id)
>
>         rte_rwlock_read_lock(&vq->access_lock);
>
> +       __atomic_store_n(&vq->irq_pending, false, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> +
>         if (dev->backend_ops->inject_irq(dev, vq)) {
>                 if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
>                         __atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_error,
> diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost.h b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> index 9723429b1c..3e78379e48 100644
> --- a/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct virtqueue_stats {
>         uint64_t iotlb_misses;
>         uint64_t inflight_submitted;
>         uint64_t inflight_completed;
> +       uint64_t guest_notifications_suppressed;
>         /* Counters below are atomic, and should be incremented as such. */
>         uint64_t guest_notifications;
>         uint64_t guest_notifications_offloaded;
> @@ -346,6 +347,8 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
>
>         struct vhost_vring_addr ring_addrs;
>         struct virtqueue_stats  stats;
> +
> +       bool irq_pending;
>  } __rte_cache_aligned;
>
>  /* Virtio device status as per Virtio specification */
> @@ -908,12 +911,24 @@ vhost_need_event(uint16_t event_idx, uint16_t new_idx, uint16_t old)
>  static __rte_always_inline void
>  vhost_vring_inject_irq(struct virtio_net *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>  {
> -       if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify &&
> -           dev->notify_ops->guest_notify(dev->vid, vq->index)) {
> -               if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
> -                       __atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_offloaded,
> -                               1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> -               return;
> +       bool expected = false;
> +
> +       if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify) {
> +               if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&vq->irq_pending, &expected, true, 0,
> +                                 __ATOMIC_RELEASE, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
> +                       if (dev->notify_ops->guest_notify(dev->vid, vq->index)) {
> +                               if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_STATS_ENABLED)
> +                                       __atomic_fetch_add(&vq->stats.guest_notifications_offloaded,
> +                                               1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> +                               return;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       /* Offloading failed, fallback to direct IRQ injection */
> +                       __atomic_store_n(&vq->irq_pending, 0, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);

Nit: s/0/false/


> +               } else {
> +                       vq->stats.guest_notifications_suppressed++;
> +                       return;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         if (dev->backend_ops->inject_irq(dev, vq)) {
> --
> 2.41.0
>