net/mlx5: fix port initialization with small LRO

Message ID 20221109165038.1049-1-getelson@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers
Series net/mlx5: fix port initialization with small LRO |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/github-robot: build success github build: passed
ci/intel-Testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-intel-Functional success Functional Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-compile-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-x86_64-unit-testing success Testing PASS
ci/iol-aarch64-compile-testing success Testing PASS

Commit Message

Gregory Etelson Nov. 9, 2022, 4:50 p.m. UTC
  If application provided maximal LRO size was less than expected PMD
minimum, the PMD either crashed with assert, if asserts were enabled,
or proceeded with port initialization to set port private maximal
LRO size below supported minimum.

The patch terminates port start if LRO size
does not match PMD requirements and TCP LRO offload was requested
at least for one Rx queue.

Fixes: 50c00baff763 ("net/mlx5: limit LRO size to maximum Rx packet")

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c     |  1 -
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Raslan Darawsheh Nov. 10, 2022, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 6:51 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad
> <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix port initialization with small LRO
> 
> If application provided maximal LRO size was less than expected PMD
> minimum, the PMD either crashed with assert, if asserts were enabled,
> or proceeded with port initialization to set port private maximal
> LRO size below supported minimum.
> 
> The patch terminates port start if LRO size
> does not match PMD requirements and TCP LRO offload was requested
> at least for one Rx queue.
> 
> Fixes: 50c00baff763 ("net/mlx5: limit LRO size to maximum Rx packet")
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>

Patch applied to next-net-mlx,

Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
index 0d9d11680b..724cd6c7e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
@@ -1533,7 +1533,6 @@  mlx5_max_lro_msg_size_adjust(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t idx,
 	    MLX5_MAX_TCP_HDR_OFFSET)
 		max_lro_size -= MLX5_MAX_TCP_HDR_OFFSET;
 	max_lro_size = RTE_MIN(max_lro_size, MLX5_MAX_LRO_SIZE);
-	MLX5_ASSERT(max_lro_size >= MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE);
 	max_lro_size /= MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE;
 	if (priv->max_lro_msg_size)
 		priv->max_lro_msg_size =
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c
index 4b821a1076..71089299b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,22 @@  mlx5_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 	else
 		rte_net_mlx5_dynf_inline_mask = 0;
 	if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues > 0) {
+		uint32_t max_lro_msg_size = priv->max_lro_msg_size;
+
+		if (max_lro_msg_size < MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE) {
+			uint32_t i;
+			struct mlx5_rxq_priv *rxq;
+
+			for (i = 0; i != priv->rxqs_n; ++i) {
+				rxq = mlx5_rxq_get(dev, i);
+				if (rxq && rxq->ctrl && rxq->ctrl->rxq.lro) {
+					DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u invalid max LRO size",
+						dev->data->port_id);
+					rte_errno = EINVAL;
+					return -rte_errno;
+				}
+			}
+		}
 		ret = mlx5_dev_configure_rss_reta(dev);
 		if (ret) {
 			DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u reta config failed: %s",