net/mlx5: fix port initialization with small LRO
Checks
Commit Message
If application provided maximal LRO size was less than expected PMD
minimum, the PMD either crashed with assert, if asserts were enabled,
or proceeded with port initialization to set port private maximal
LRO size below supported minimum.
The patch terminates port start if LRO size
does not match PMD requirements and TCP LRO offload was requested
at least for one Rx queue.
Fixes: 50c00baff763 ("net/mlx5: limit LRO size to maximum Rx packet")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 1 -
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_trigger.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2022 6:51 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad
> <matan@nvidia.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix port initialization with small LRO
>
> If application provided maximal LRO size was less than expected PMD
> minimum, the PMD either crashed with assert, if asserts were enabled,
> or proceeded with port initialization to set port private maximal
> LRO size below supported minimum.
>
> The patch terminates port start if LRO size
> does not match PMD requirements and TCP LRO offload was requested
> at least for one Rx queue.
>
> Fixes: 50c00baff763 ("net/mlx5: limit LRO size to maximum Rx packet")
>
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Patch applied to next-net-mlx,
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
@@ -1533,7 +1533,6 @@ mlx5_max_lro_msg_size_adjust(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t idx,
MLX5_MAX_TCP_HDR_OFFSET)
max_lro_size -= MLX5_MAX_TCP_HDR_OFFSET;
max_lro_size = RTE_MIN(max_lro_size, MLX5_MAX_LRO_SIZE);
- MLX5_ASSERT(max_lro_size >= MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE);
max_lro_size /= MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE;
if (priv->max_lro_msg_size)
priv->max_lro_msg_size =
@@ -1167,6 +1167,22 @@ mlx5_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
else
rte_net_mlx5_dynf_inline_mask = 0;
if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues > 0) {
+ uint32_t max_lro_msg_size = priv->max_lro_msg_size;
+
+ if (max_lro_msg_size < MLX5_LRO_SEG_CHUNK_SIZE) {
+ uint32_t i;
+ struct mlx5_rxq_priv *rxq;
+
+ for (i = 0; i != priv->rxqs_n; ++i) {
+ rxq = mlx5_rxq_get(dev, i);
+ if (rxq && rxq->ctrl && rxq->ctrl->rxq.lro) {
+ DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u invalid max LRO size",
+ dev->data->port_id);
+ rte_errno = EINVAL;
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+ }
+ }
ret = mlx5_dev_configure_rss_reta(dev);
if (ret) {
DRV_LOG(ERR, "port %u reta config failed: %s",