[1/1] common/cnxk: update partnumber for 103xx
Checks
Commit Message
During model population part number is different
for 103xx and hence dpdk initialization fails.
This fix resolves the same.
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
---
drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:02 PM Rakesh Kudurumalla
<rkudurumalla@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> During model population part number is different
> for 103xx and hence dpdk initialization fails.
> This fix resolves the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
Updated the git commit as follows and applied to
dpdk-next-net-mrvl/for-next-net. Thanks
common/cnxk: fix partnumber for CN103xx
Correct the partnumber value for CN103xx.
Fixes: dd462f68f04a ("common/cnxk: support CN103XX platform")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> index a68baa65ea..c934a10509 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> +++ b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_model.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct roc_model *roc_model;
> #define PART_106xx 0xB9
> #define PART_105xx 0xBA
> #define PART_105xxN 0xBC
> -#define PART_103xx 0xBE
> +#define PART_103xx 0xBD
> #define PART_98xx 0xB1
> #define PART_96xx 0xB2
> #define PART_95xx 0xB3
> --
> 2.25.1
>
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct roc_model *roc_model;
#define PART_106xx 0xB9
#define PART_105xx 0xBA
#define PART_105xxN 0xBC
-#define PART_103xx 0xBE
+#define PART_103xx 0xBD
#define PART_98xx 0xB1
#define PART_96xx 0xB2
#define PART_95xx 0xB3