[4/4] net/bnxt: fix VF resource allocation strategy
Checks
Commit Message
From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
1. VFs need a notification queue to handle async messages.
But the current logic does not reserve a notification queue leading
to initialization failure in some cases.
2. With the current logic, DPDK PF driver reserves only one VNIC
to the VFs leading to initialization failure with more than 1 RXQs.
Added logic to distribute number of NQs and VNICs from the pool
across VFs and PF.
While reserving resources for the VFs, the strategy is to keep
both min & max values the same. This could result in a failure
when there isn't enough resources to satisfy the request.
Hence fixed to instruct the FW to not reserve all minimum
resources requested for the VF. The VF driver can request the FW
for the allocated resources during probe.
Fixes: b7778e8a1c00 ("net/bnxt: refactor to properly allocate resources for PF/VF")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_hwrm.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
@@ -902,15 +902,7 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_func_qcaps(struct bnxt *bp)
bp->max_l2_ctx = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->max_l2_ctxs);
if (!BNXT_CHIP_P5(bp) && !bp->pdev->max_vfs)
bp->max_l2_ctx += bp->max_rx_em_flows;
- /* TODO: For now, do not support VMDq/RFS on VFs. */
- if (BNXT_PF(bp)) {
- if (bp->pf->max_vfs)
- bp->max_vnics = 1;
- else
- bp->max_vnics = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->max_vnics);
- } else {
- bp->max_vnics = 1;
- }
+ bp->max_vnics = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->max_vnics);
PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Max l2_cntxts is %d vnics is %d\n",
bp->max_l2_ctx, bp->max_vnics);
bp->max_stat_ctx = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->max_stat_ctx);
@@ -3495,7 +3487,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp,
rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_hw_ring_grps);
} else if (BNXT_HAS_NQ(bp)) {
enables |= HWRM_FUNC_CFG_INPUT_ENABLES_NUM_MSIX;
- req.num_msix = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_nq_rings);
+ req.num_msix = rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_nq_rings);
}
req.flags = rte_cpu_to_le_32(bp->pf->func_cfg_flags);
@@ -3508,7 +3500,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_pf_func_cfg(struct bnxt *bp,
req.num_tx_rings = rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_tx_rings);
req.num_rx_rings = rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_rx_rings);
req.num_l2_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_l2_ctxs);
- req.num_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_vnics);
+ req.num_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(pf_resc->num_vnics);
req.fid = rte_cpu_to_le_16(0xffff);
req.enables = rte_cpu_to_le_32(enables);
@@ -3545,14 +3537,12 @@ bnxt_fill_vf_func_cfg_req_new(struct bnxt *bp,
req->min_rx_rings = req->max_rx_rings;
req->max_l2_ctxs = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_l2_ctx / (num_vfs + 1));
req->min_l2_ctxs = req->max_l2_ctxs;
- /* TODO: For now, do not support VMDq/RFS on VFs. */
- req->max_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(1);
+ req->max_vnics = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_vnics / (num_vfs + 1));
req->min_vnics = req->max_vnics;
req->max_hw_ring_grps = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_ring_grps /
(num_vfs + 1));
req->min_hw_ring_grps = req->max_hw_ring_grps;
- req->flags =
- rte_cpu_to_le_16(HWRM_FUNC_VF_RESOURCE_CFG_INPUT_FLAGS_MIN_GUARANTEED);
+ req->max_msix = rte_cpu_to_le_16(bp->max_nq_rings / (num_vfs + 1));
}
static void
@@ -3612,6 +3602,8 @@ static int bnxt_update_max_resources(struct bnxt *bp,
bp->max_rx_rings -= rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_rx_rings);
bp->max_l2_ctx -= rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_l2_ctx);
bp->max_ring_grps -= rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_hw_ring_grps);
+ bp->max_nq_rings -= rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_msix);
+ bp->max_vnics -= rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_vnics);
HWRM_UNLOCK();
@@ -3685,6 +3677,8 @@ static int bnxt_query_pf_resources(struct bnxt *bp,
pf_resc->num_rx_rings = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_rx_rings);
pf_resc->num_l2_ctxs = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_l2_ctx);
pf_resc->num_hw_ring_grps = rte_le_to_cpu_32(resp->alloc_hw_ring_grps);
+ pf_resc->num_nq_rings = rte_le_to_cpu_32(resp->alloc_msix);
+ pf_resc->num_vnics = rte_le_to_cpu_16(resp->alloc_vnics);
bp->pf->evb_mode = resp->evb_mode;
HWRM_UNLOCK();
@@ -3705,6 +3699,8 @@ bnxt_calculate_pf_resources(struct bnxt *bp,
pf_resc->num_rx_rings = bp->max_rx_rings;
pf_resc->num_l2_ctxs = bp->max_l2_ctx;
pf_resc->num_hw_ring_grps = bp->max_ring_grps;
+ pf_resc->num_nq_rings = bp->max_nq_rings;
+ pf_resc->num_vnics = bp->max_vnics;
return;
}
@@ -3723,6 +3719,10 @@ bnxt_calculate_pf_resources(struct bnxt *bp,
bp->max_l2_ctx % (num_vfs + 1);
pf_resc->num_hw_ring_grps = bp->max_ring_grps / (num_vfs + 1) +
bp->max_ring_grps % (num_vfs + 1);
+ pf_resc->num_nq_rings = bp->max_nq_rings / (num_vfs + 1) +
+ bp->max_nq_rings % (num_vfs + 1);
+ pf_resc->num_vnics = bp->max_vnics / (num_vfs + 1) +
+ bp->max_vnics % (num_vfs + 1);
}
int bnxt_hwrm_allocate_pf_only(struct bnxt *bp)
@@ -3898,6 +3898,8 @@ bnxt_update_pf_resources(struct bnxt *bp,
bp->max_tx_rings = pf_resc->num_tx_rings;
bp->max_rx_rings = pf_resc->num_rx_rings;
bp->max_ring_grps = pf_resc->num_hw_ring_grps;
+ bp->max_nq_rings = pf_resc->num_nq_rings;
+ bp->max_vnics = pf_resc->num_vnics;
}
static int32_t
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ struct bnxt_pf_resource_info {
uint16_t num_rx_rings;
uint16_t num_cp_rings;
uint16_t num_l2_ctxs;
+ uint16_t num_nq_rings;
+ uint16_t num_vnics;
uint32_t num_hw_ring_grps;
};