From patchwork Fri Jun 18 14:03:51 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Maxime Coquelin X-Patchwork-Id: 94508 X-Patchwork-Delegate: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E52EA0C46; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966D9410EF; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:04:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220A6410DE for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:04:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1624025051; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=p5ifyoguWwTJ4/PHtxZC50++jvmsTMeiRvv64l3peaQ=; b=Kh9TdaEwzRdlduC5+1uD0RwvSuB4l9z/SQCy5F4cB4vE8JJqyKwcM6FM495GpJEOLsmmx4 qKRO+5l1D7wXWtTuCKqYu1ot4d2MVuJBJ9bwj+PYm3N7EqXbjkCvMwqiI9vbCGzt4wpRNk fYuc71etscMU4lPLIkP43VNjs/7jqI8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-105-J5gpyuPIP9SICZLs1Szs_g-1; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:04:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: J5gpyuPIP9SICZLs1Szs_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1ADFBBEE6; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from max-t490s.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.110.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6921369A; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:04:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxime Coquelin To: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com Cc: Maxime Coquelin , stable@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:03:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20210618140357.255995-2-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210618140357.255995-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20210618140357.255995-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/7] vhost: fix missing memory table NUMA realloc X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" When the guest allocates virtqueues on a different NUMA node than the one the Vhost metadata are allocated, both the Vhost device struct and the virtqueues struct are reallocated. However, reallocating the Vhost memory table was missing, which likely causes at least one cross-NUMA accesses for every burst of packets. This patch reallocates this table on the same NUMA node as the other metadata. Fixes: 552e8fd3d2b4 ("vhost: simplify memory regions handling") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Reported-by: David Marchand Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin Reviewed-by: Chenbo Xia --- lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c index 8f0eba6412..b5a84f3dcd 100644 --- a/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/vhost/vhost_user.c @@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ vhost_user_set_vring_num(struct virtio_net **pdev, } /* - * Reallocate virtio_dev and vhost_virtqueue data structure to make them on the - * same numa node as the memory of vring descriptor. + * Reallocate virtio_dev, vhost_virtqueue and related data structures to + * make them on the same numa node as the memory of vring descriptor. */ #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA static struct virtio_net* @@ -557,6 +557,9 @@ numa_realloc(struct virtio_net *dev, int index) goto out; } if (oldnode != newnode) { + struct rte_vhost_memory *old_mem; + ssize_t mem_size; + VHOST_LOG_CONFIG(INFO, "reallocate dev from %d to %d node\n", oldnode, newnode); @@ -568,6 +571,18 @@ numa_realloc(struct virtio_net *dev, int index) memcpy(dev, old_dev, sizeof(*dev)); rte_free(old_dev); + + mem_size = sizeof(struct rte_vhost_memory) + + sizeof(struct rte_vhost_mem_region) * dev->mem->nregions; + old_mem = dev->mem; + dev->mem = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, mem_size, 0, newnode); + if (!dev->mem) { + dev->mem = old_mem; + goto out; + } + + memcpy(dev->mem, old_mem, mem_size); + rte_free(old_mem); } out: