From patchwork Wed May 12 11:36:54 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Power, Ciara" X-Patchwork-Id: 93214 X-Patchwork-Delegate: gakhil@marvell.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C14FA0C43; Wed, 12 May 2021 13:38:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500641129; Wed, 12 May 2021 13:37:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099784110A; Wed, 12 May 2021 13:37:27 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: Jhn2/7qhBupS7D2d39OAUT3SMfqv3UID5kV7lPBqNdz6qztfxodNnbTmE4Q2AVsFcC4l7Zdj9i MRw9U/sTp5QA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9981"; a="199733860" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,293,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="199733860" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2021 04:37:26 -0700 IronPort-SDR: qOW6RGVz5ihCbjVettgjaIjEzTc1sQPx82cm9PdVDalTqQs+4j31D98uJSMkkjVbmnvaDmscqT N5dAWMi+C+OQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,293,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="625296909" Received: from silpixa00400355.ir.intel.com (HELO silpixa00400355.ger.corp.intel.com) ([10.237.223.148]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2021 04:37:23 -0700 From: Ciara Power To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com, gakhil@marvell.com, aconole@redhat.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, anoobj@marvell.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, asomalap@amd.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, g.singh@nxp.com, roy.fan.zhang@intel.com, Ciara Power , stable@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:36:54 +0000 Message-Id: <20210512113655.568814-7-ciara.power@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210512113655.568814-1-ciara.power@intel.com> References: <20210512113655.568814-1-ciara.power@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] test/crypto: fix return value on test skipped X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The blockcipher testcase return value TEST_SUCCESS was incorrect for one conditional check, it should have been TEST_SKIPPED similar to the other condition checks in this function when the testcase is skipped. Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API") Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Ciara Power Acked-by: Akhil Goyal Acked-by: Declan Doherty Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal Tested-by: Ruifeng Wang --- app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c index b99d2ce50a..411968837f 100644 --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_blockcipher.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ test_blockcipher_one_case(const struct blockcipher_test_case *t, printf("Raw Data Path APIs do not support OOP, " "Test Skipped.\n"); snprintf(test_msg, BLOCKCIPHER_TEST_MSG_LEN, "SKIPPED"); - status = TEST_SUCCESS; + status = TEST_SKIPPED; goto error_exit; } }