[v3,06/11] eal: catch invalid log level number

Message ID 20210312181720.242252-7-thomas@monjalon.net (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: David Marchand
Headers
Series improve options help |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch warning coding style issues

Commit Message

Thomas Monjalon March 12, 2021, 6:17 p.m. UTC
  The parsing check for invalid log level was not trying to catch
irrelevant numeric values.
A log level 0 is now a failure in options parsing so it can be caught early.
A log level higher than the max (8) is accepted with a warning message.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
---
 lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
index 3675e55fc9..2df3ae04ea 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c
@@ -1289,10 +1289,15 @@  eal_parse_log_level(const char *arg)
 	}
 
 	priority = eal_parse_log_priority(level);
-	if (priority < 0) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "invalid log priority: %s\n", level);
+	if (priority <= 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid log level: %s\n", level);
 		goto fail;
 	}
+	if (priority > (int)RTE_LOG_MAX) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Log level %d higher than maximum (%d)\n",
+				priority, RTE_LOG_MAX);
+		priority = RTE_LOG_MAX;
+	}
 
 	if (regex) {
 		if (rte_log_set_level_regexp(regex, priority) < 0) {