From patchwork Thu Nov 1 19:53:28 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alejandro Lucero X-Patchwork-Id: 47693 X-Patchwork-Delegate: thomas@monjalon.net Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61EE1B1F4; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:53:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from netronome.com (host-79-78-33-110.static.as9105.net [79.78.33.110]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EFF1B13F for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 20:53:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from netronome.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netronome.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTP id wA1JrVNp019535 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 19:53:31 GMT Received: (from root@localhost) by netronome.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wA1JrV3l019534 for dev@dpdk.org; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 19:53:31 GMT From: Alejandro Lucero To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 19:53:28 +0000 Message-Id: <20181101195330.19464-6-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181101195330.19464-1-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> References: <20181101195330.19464-1-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] mem: modify error message for DMA mask check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" If DMA mask checks shows mapped memory out of the supported range specified by the DMA mask, nothing can be done but return an error an report the error. This can imply the app not being executed at all or precluding dynamic memory allocation once the app is running. In any case, we can advice the user to force IOVA as PA if currently IOVA being VA and user being root. Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero Tested-by: Li, WenjieX A --- lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c index 4997c5ef5..c2c112aa6 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c @@ -321,13 +321,44 @@ alloc_pages_on_heap(struct malloc_heap *heap, uint64_t pg_sz, size_t elt_size, goto fail; } - if (mcfg->dma_maskbits) { - if (rte_mem_check_dma_mask(mcfg->dma_maskbits)) { + /* + * Once we have all the memseg lists configured, if there is a dma mask + * set, check iova addresses are not out of range. Otherwise the device + * setting the dma mask could have problems with the mapped memory. + * + * There are two situations when this can happen: + * 1) memory initialization + * 2) dynamic memory allocation + * + * For 1), an error when checking dma mask implies app can not be + * executed. For 2) implies the new memory can not be added. + */ + if (mcfg->dma_maskbits && + rte_mem_check_dma_mask(mcfg->dma_maskbits)) { + /* + * Currently this can only happen if IOMMU is enabled + * and the address width supported by the IOMMU hw is + * not enough for using the memory mapped IOVAs. + * + * If IOVA is VA, advice to try with '--iova-mode pa' + * which could solve some situations when IOVA VA is not + * really needed. + */ + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, + "%s(): couldn't allocate memory due to IOVA exceeding limits of current DMA mask\n", + __func__); + + /* + * If IOVA is VA and it is possible to run with IOVA PA, + * because user is root, give and advice for solving the + * problem. + */ + if ((rte_eal_iova_mode() == RTE_IOVA_VA) && + rte_eal_using_phys_addrs()) RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, - "%s(): couldn't allocate memory due to DMA mask\n", + "%s(): Please try initializing EAL with --iova-mode=pa parameter\n", __func__); - goto fail; - } + goto fail; } /* add newly minted memsegs to malloc heap */