[6/6] doc: remove internal libs from release notes

  These libraries has exported functions but the target of those functions
are not user but other libraries.

The version of these libraries doesn't mean much to the user so can be
dropped from release notes.

Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
Indeed this is more a question, should we keep them or remove them?
---
 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
  

On Monday 15 October 2018 08:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> These libraries has exported functions but the target of those functions
> are not user but other libraries.
> 
> The version of these libraries doesn't mean much to the user so can be
> dropped from release notes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---
> Indeed this is more a question, should we keep them or remove them?

+1 for removing them.
At least for dpaa/fslmc perspective, I don't see any additional benefit 
in release note. These libraries (dpaa/fslmc) are not actually 
'libraries' in true (read, plugability) sense :)

> ---
>   doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst | 7 -------
>   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst
> index 03f73484e..8b755a7e9 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst
> @@ -291,12 +291,6 @@ The libraries prepended with a plus sign were incremented in this version.
>        librte_bbdev.so.1
>        librte_bitratestats.so.2
>        librte_bpf.so.1
> -   + librte_bus_dpaa.so.2
> -   + librte_bus_fslmc.so.2
> -   + librte_bus_ifpga.so.2
> -   + librte_bus_pci.so.2
> -   + librte_bus_vdev.so.2
> -   + librte_bus_vmbus.so.2
>        librte_cfgfile.so.2
>        librte_cmdline.so.2
>        librte_compressdev.so.1
> @@ -322,7 +316,6 @@ The libraries prepended with a plus sign were incremented in this version.
>        librte_meter.so.2
>        librte_metrics.so.1
>        librte_net.so.1
> -     librte_pci.so.1
>        librte_pdump.so.2
>        librte_pipeline.so.3
>        librte_pmd_bnxt.so.2
>
  

16/10/2018 13:52, Shreyansh Jain:
> On Monday 15 October 2018 08:20 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > These libraries has exported functions but the target of those functions
> > are not user but other libraries.
> > 
> > The version of these libraries doesn't mean much to the user so can be
> > dropped from release notes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Indeed this is more a question, should we keep them or remove them?
> 
> +1 for removing them.
> At least for dpaa/fslmc perspective, I don't see any additional benefit 
> in release note. These libraries (dpaa/fslmc) are not actually 
> 'libraries' in true (read, plugability) sense :)

> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.rst
> > -   + librte_bus_dpaa.so.2
> > -   + librte_bus_fslmc.so.2
> > -   + librte_bus_ifpga.so.2
> > -   + librte_bus_pci.so.2
> > -   + librte_bus_vdev.so.2
> > -   + librte_bus_vmbus.so.2

The ABI of bus libraries is important if you want to plug a PMD
into an older DPDK: if bus ABI has changed, you cannot.
I am for keeping them.

> > -     librte_pci.so.1

This is a true library!