From patchwork Thu Oct 4 08:13:45 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Maxime Coquelin X-Patchwork-Id: 46022 X-Patchwork-Delegate: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4881B101; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:14:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98011B101; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:14:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1AF46202; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.36.112.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057773091322; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:14:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxime Coquelin To: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com, nicknickolaev@gmail.com, i.maximets@samsung.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, alejandro.lucero@netronome.com Cc: dgilbert@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:13:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20181004081403.8039-2-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181004081403.8039-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20181004081403.8039-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/19] vhost: fix messages error checks X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not been updated, leading to success messages handling being treated as errors. Fixes: 2f270595c05d ("vhost: rework message handling as a callback array") Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin Acked-by: Ilya Maximets --- lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c index 7ef3fb4a4..060b41893 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c @@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) } skip_to_post_handle: - if (!ret && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) { + if (ret != VH_RESULT_ERR && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) { uint32_t need_reply; ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)( @@ -1800,10 +1800,10 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev); if (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY) { - msg.payload.u64 = !!ret; + msg.payload.u64 = ret == VH_RESULT_ERR; msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64); send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg); - } else if (ret) { + } else if (ret == VH_RESULT_ERR) { RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, "vhost message handling failed.\n"); return -1;