| Message ID | 19384408-c7b8-8140-2f92-a4fcc071715f@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Delegated to: | Ferruh Yigit |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net/hinic: fix coredump when secondary process using the hinic port. | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ci/iol-testing | success | Testing PASS |
| ci/Intel-compilation | success | Compilation OK |
| ci/iol-mellanox-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/travis-robot | success | Travis build: passed |
| ci/iol-intel-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-intel-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-broadcom-Performance | success | Performance Testing PASS |
| ci/iol-broadcom-Functional | success | Functional Testing PASS |
| ci/checkpatch | warning | coding style issues |
On 11/2/2020 2:48 PM, Qingqing Li wrote: > the reason is that during the stage of secondary process port initialization, > it lacks the initialization of "eth_dev->dev_ops". > > Signed-off-by: Qingqing Li <liqingqing3@huawei.com> Hi Ziyang, Guoyang, Xiaoyun, The patch is around for a long time [1], can you please review the patch? Review has been requested multiple times now, not sure why there is no response. As 'hinic' driver maintainers, expectation is not just send patches to your driver, also review patches in the community, *at least* ones against your driver. Thanks, ferruh [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75318/ https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75319/ [ There are a few more versions in between ] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/83174/ https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/83421/ [This one]
On 11/11/2020 1:07 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 11/2/2020 2:48 PM, Qingqing Li wrote: >> the reason is that during the stage of secondary process port initialization, >> it lacks the initialization of "eth_dev->dev_ops". >> >> Signed-off-by: Qingqing Li <liqingqing3@huawei.com> > > Hi Ziyang, Guoyang, Xiaoyun, > > The patch is around for a long time [1], can you please review the patch? > > Review has been requested multiple times now, not sure why there is no response. > > As 'hinic' driver maintainers, expectation is not just send patches to your > driver, also review patches in the community, *at least* ones against your driver. > > Thanks, > ferruh > > > [1] > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75318/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/75319/ > [ There are a few more versions in between ] > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/83174/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/83421/ [This one] Hi Ziyang, Guoyang, Xiaoyun, What is the latest status of this patch?
diff --git a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c index b694fd83c..786095e9d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c @@ -3100,14 +3100,6 @@ static int hinic_func_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(eth_dev); - /* EAL is SECONDARY and eth_dev is already created */ - if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) { - PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Initialize %s in secondary process", - eth_dev->data->name); - - return 0; - } - eth_dev->data->dev_flags |= RTE_ETH_DEV_AUTOFILL_QUEUE_XSTATS; nic_dev = HINIC_ETH_DEV_TO_PRIVATE_NIC_DEV(eth_dev); @@ -3241,6 +3233,20 @@ static int hinic_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst = hinic_recv_pkts; eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst = hinic_xmit_pkts; + /* EAL is SECONDARY and eth_dev is already created */ + if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) { + PMD_DRV_LOG(INFO, "Initialize %s in secondary process", + eth_dev->data->name); + + struct hinic_nic_dev *nic_dev = + HINIC_ETH_DEV_TO_PRIVATE_NIC_DEV(eth_dev); + if (HINIC_IS_VF(nic_dev->hwdev)) + eth_dev->dev_ops = &hinic_pmd_vf_ops; + else + eth_dev->dev_ops = &hinic_pmd_ops; + return 0; + } + return hinic_func_init(eth_dev); }
the reason is that during the stage of secondary process port initialization, it lacks the initialization of "eth_dev->dev_ops". Signed-off-by: Qingqing Li <liqingqing3@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/hinic/hinic_pmd_ethdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)