diff mbox series

[1/2] net/mlx5: fix wrong layer validation with decapsulation

Message ID 1582122380-54467-2-git-send-email-suanmingm@mellanox.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Raslan Darawsheh
Headers
Series net/mlx5: fix incorrect layer choose with decap |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/iol-mellanox-Performance success Performance Testing PASS
ci/iol-testing success Testing PASS
ci/Intel-compilation fail apply issues

Commit Message

Suanming Mou Feb. 19, 2020, 2:26 p.m. UTC 
  Currently, the flow validate function only validate the outermost layer
with the header modify actions. If there is decapsulation action before
the header modify action, the validation should choose the inner layer
for validation.

Add decapsulation check when validate with the header modify actions.
Choose the inner layer once there is decapsulation action.

Fixes: 4bb14c83df95 ("net/mlx5: support modify header using Direct Verbs")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Matan Azrad Feb. 19, 2020, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #1 
From: Suanming Mou
> Currently, the flow validate function only validate the outermost layer with
> the header modify actions. If there is decapsulation action before the header
> modify action, the validation should choose the inner layer for validation.
> 
> Add decapsulation check when validate with the header modify actions.
> Choose the inner layer once there is decapsulation action.
> 
> Fixes: 4bb14c83df95 ("net/mlx5: support modify header using Direct Verbs")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 1c01269..410c555 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -3096,10 +3096,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				    struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3_IPV4))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV4 :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL,
@@ -3130,10 +3134,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				    struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3_IPV6))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3_IPV6 :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL,
@@ -3164,10 +3172,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				  struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L4))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL, "no transport layer "
@@ -3199,10 +3211,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				       struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_TCP :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL, "no TCP item in"
@@ -3244,10 +3260,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				       struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4_TCP :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL, "no TCP item in"
@@ -3288,10 +3308,14 @@  struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
 				   struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
+	uint64_t layer;
 
 	ret = flow_dv_validate_action_modify_hdr(action_flags, action, error);
 	if (!ret) {
-		if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_L3))
+		layer = (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DECAP) ?
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3 :
+				 MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3;
+		if (!(item_flags & layer))
 			return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
 						  RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
 						  NULL,