diff mbox series

crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD

Message ID 1554726370-16591-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Rejected, archived
Delegated to: akhil goyal
Headers show
Series crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK
ci/Intel-compilation success Compilation OK
ci/intel-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS
ci/mellanox-Performance-Testing success Performance Testing PASS

Commit Message

Iremonger, Bernard April 8, 2019, 12:26 p.m. UTC
While running the IPsec unit tests the following
segmentation fault is occurring:

Thread 1 "test" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000bf3b50 in qat_sym_process_response (
op=0x5355280 <unittest_params+512>, resp=0x100455100 "")
at /root/dpdk/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h:161
161	if (sess->bpi_ctx)

Fixes: 91614c73b67c ("crypto/qat: make response process function inline")
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Trahe, Fiona April 8, 2019, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Bernard,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 1:26 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD
> 
> While running the IPsec unit tests the following
> segmentation fault is occurring:
> 
> Thread 1 "test" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0000000000bf3b50 in qat_sym_process_response (
> op=0x5355280 <unittest_params+512>, resp=0x100455100 "")
> at /root/dpdk/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h:161
> 161	if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> 
> Fixes: 91614c73b67c ("crypto/qat: make response process function inline")
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> index bc6426c..685c6c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> @@ -157,10 +157,12 @@ qat_sym_process_response(void **op, uint8_t *resp)
>  						rx_op->sym->session,
>  						cryptodev_qat_driver_id);
> 
> -
> -		if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> +		if (sess == NULL)
> +			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED;
> +		else if (sess->bpi_ctx) {
>  			qat_bpicipher_postprocess(sess, rx_op);
> -		rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	*op = (void *)rx_op;
>  }
> --
> 2.7.4
[Fiona] As for previous seg-fault- this is on data-path and likely due to the application sending
in an invalid session - or a session created for a symmetric PMD, but being sent to a
QAT asymmetric PMD - whose driver_id would not appear in the session array.
Can you make sure to check for SYMMETRIC support in capabilities.
Iremonger, Bernard April 8, 2019, 4:56 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Fiona,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 5:44 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD
> 
> Hi Bernard,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Iremonger, Bernard
> > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 1:26 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; Ananyev,
> > Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com
> > Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD
> >
> > While running the IPsec unit tests the following segmentation fault is
> > occurring:
> >
> > Thread 1 "test" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x0000000000bf3b50 in qat_sym_process_response (
> > op=0x5355280 <unittest_params+512>, resp=0x100455100 "") at
> > /root/dpdk/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h:161
> > 161	if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> >
> > Fixes: 91614c73b67c ("crypto/qat: make response process function
> > inline")
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h index bc6426c..685c6c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > @@ -157,10 +157,12 @@ qat_sym_process_response(void **op, uint8_t
> *resp)
> >  						rx_op->sym->session,
> >  						cryptodev_qat_driver_id);
> >
> > -
> > -		if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> > +		if (sess == NULL)
> > +			rx_op->status =
> RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED;
> > +		else if (sess->bpi_ctx) {
> >  			qat_bpicipher_postprocess(sess, rx_op);
> > -		rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> > +			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> >  	*op = (void *)rx_op;
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> [Fiona] As for previous seg-fault- this is on data-path and likely due to the
> application sending in an invalid session - or a session created for a symmetric
> PMD, but being sent to a QAT asymmetric PMD - whose driver_id would not
> appear in the session array.
> Can you make sure to check for SYMMETRIC support in capabilities.
> 
I have the asym PMD disabled in the common/config_base  file.
I will investigate further.

Regards,

Bernard.
Iremonger, Bernard April 10, 2019, 2:19 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Fiona,

<snip>

> > > Subject: [PATCH] crypto/qat: fix second seg fault in QAT PMD
> > >
> > > While running the IPsec unit tests the following segmentation fault
> > > is
> > > occurring:
> > >
> > > Thread 1 "test" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x0000000000bf3b50 in qat_sym_process_response (
> > > op=0x5355280 <unittest_params+512>, resp=0x100455100 "") at
> > > /root/dpdk/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h:161
> > > 161	if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> > >
> > > Fixes: 91614c73b67c ("crypto/qat: make response process function
> > > inline")
> > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h | 8 +++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > > b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h index bc6426c..685c6c0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
> > > @@ -157,10 +157,12 @@ qat_sym_process_response(void **op, uint8_t
> > *resp)
> > >  						rx_op->sym->session,
> > >  						cryptodev_qat_driver_id);
> > >
> > > -
> > > -		if (sess->bpi_ctx)
> > > +		if (sess == NULL)
> > > +			rx_op->status =
> > RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED;
> > > +		else if (sess->bpi_ctx) {
> > >  			qat_bpicipher_postprocess(sess, rx_op);
> > > -		rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> > > +			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> > > +		}
> > >  	}
> > >  	*op = (void *)rx_op;
> > >  }
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > [Fiona] As for previous seg-fault- this is on data-path and likely due
> > to the application sending in an invalid session - or a session
> > created for a symmetric PMD, but being sent to a QAT asymmetric PMD -
> > whose driver_id would not appear in the session array.
> > Can you make sure to check for SYMMETRIC support in capabilities.
> >
> I have the asym PMD disabled in the common/config_base  file.
> I will investigate further.

Self NAK of this patch as causing  test failures.
 
 Regards,
 
 Bernard.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
index bc6426c..685c6c0 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_sym.h
@@ -157,10 +157,12 @@  qat_sym_process_response(void **op, uint8_t *resp)
 						rx_op->sym->session,
 						cryptodev_qat_driver_id);
 
-
-		if (sess->bpi_ctx)
+		if (sess == NULL)
+			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_AUTH_FAILED;
+		else if (sess->bpi_ctx) {
 			qat_bpicipher_postprocess(sess, rx_op);
-		rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
+			rx_op->status = RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS;
+		}
 	}
 	*op = (void *)rx_op;
 }