[dpdk-dev] ethdev: fix memory leaks in remove rxtx callbacks
Checks
Commit Message
The patch frees memory allocated by add rxtx callbacks
Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Comments
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Abhinandan Gujjar
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 3:32 AM
> To: thomas@monjalon.net
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix memory leaks in remove rxtx callbacks
>
> The patch frees memory allocated by add rxtx callbacks
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index 318af28..2ab6e05 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -3229,6 +3229,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_idx,
> if (cb == user_cb) {
> /* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
> *prev_cb = cb->next;
> + rte_free(cb);
It is not that straightforward unfortunately -
that function can be called while RX/TX is active for the same queue.
That's why it is a responsibility of the caller to determine when it is safe
to free associated resources.
I submitted and RFC to fix that issue in a safe way:
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31867/
Konstantin
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> @@ -3263,6 +3264,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_idx,
> if (cb == user_cb) {
> /* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
> *prev_cb = cb->next;
> + rte_free(cb);
> ret = 0;
> break;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 2:47 PM
> To: Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>;
> thomas@monjalon.net
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix memory leaks in remove rxtx
> callbacks
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Abhinandan Gujjar
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 3:32 AM
> > To: thomas@monjalon.net
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gujjar, Abhinandan S <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix memory leaks in remove rxtx
> > callbacks
> >
> > The patch frees memory allocated by add rxtx callbacks
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abhinandan Gujjar <abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c index 318af28..2ab6e05 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -3229,6 +3229,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id,
> uint16_t queue_idx,
> > if (cb == user_cb) {
> > /* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
> > *prev_cb = cb->next;
> > + rte_free(cb);
>
> It is not that straightforward unfortunately - that function can be called while
> RX/TX is active for the same queue.
> That's why it is a responsibility of the caller to determine when it is safe to free
> associated resources.
> I submitted and RFC to fix that issue in a safe way:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31867/
> Konstantin
Thanks for pointing to the patch. I could not find it in the search!
Abhinandan
>
> > ret = 0;
> > break;
> > }
> > @@ -3263,6 +3264,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id,
> uint16_t queue_idx,
> > if (cb == user_cb) {
> > /* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
> > *prev_cb = cb->next;
> > + rte_free(cb);
> > ret = 0;
> > break;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.9.1
@@ -3229,6 +3229,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_idx,
if (cb == user_cb) {
/* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
*prev_cb = cb->next;
+ rte_free(cb);
ret = 0;
break;
}
@@ -3263,6 +3264,7 @@ int rte_eth_set_queue_rate_limit(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue_idx,
if (cb == user_cb) {
/* Remove the user cb from the callback list. */
*prev_cb = cb->next;
+ rte_free(cb);
ret = 0;
break;
}