[dpdk-dev,v2,25/32] net/sfc/base: do not use enum type when values are bitmask
Checks
Commit Message
From: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
ICC complains that enumerated type mixed with another type.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lee <alee@solarflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Stonehouse <rstonehouse@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h | 12 ++++++------
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Comments
On 12/15/2016 12:51 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Hi Andrew,
For this patch "Signed-off" and "From" mail addresses are different.
Since both are same person and you, is there any problem using "Andrew
Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>" as author of the patch?
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> ICC complains that enumerated type mixed with another type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lee <alee@solarflare.com>
> Reviewed-by: Robert Stonehouse <rstonehouse@solarflare.com>
> ---
<...>
On 01/18/2017 02:30 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 12:51 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> From: Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> For this patch "Signed-off" and "From" mail addresses are different.
> Since both are same person and you, is there any problem using "Andrew
> Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>" as author of the patch?
Yes, please, use "Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>"
It was my mistake in configs.
Thanks,
Andrew.
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
>> ICC complains that enumerated type mixed with another type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lee <alee@solarflare.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Robert Stonehouse <rstonehouse@solarflare.com>
>> ---
> <...>
@@ -304,13 +304,13 @@ efx_mcdi_rss_context_set_flags(
MCDI_IN_POPULATE_DWORD_4(req, RSS_CONTEXT_SET_FLAGS_IN_FLAGS,
RSS_CONTEXT_SET_FLAGS_IN_TOEPLITZ_IPV4_EN,
- (type & (1U << EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4)) ? 1 : 0,
+ (type & EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4) ? 1 : 0,
RSS_CONTEXT_SET_FLAGS_IN_TOEPLITZ_TCPV4_EN,
- (type & (1U << EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4)) ? 1 : 0,
+ (type & EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4) ? 1 : 0,
RSS_CONTEXT_SET_FLAGS_IN_TOEPLITZ_IPV6_EN,
- (type & (1U << EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6)) ? 1 : 0,
+ (type & EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6) ? 1 : 0,
RSS_CONTEXT_SET_FLAGS_IN_TOEPLITZ_TCPV6_EN,
- (type & (1U << EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6)) ? 1 : 0);
+ (type & EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6) ? 1 : 0);
efx_mcdi_execute(enp, &req);
@@ -1851,12 +1851,12 @@ typedef enum efx_rx_hash_alg_e {
EFX_RX_HASHALG_TOEPLITZ
} efx_rx_hash_alg_t;
-typedef enum efx_rx_hash_type_e {
- EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4 = 0,
- EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4,
- EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6,
- EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6,
-} efx_rx_hash_type_t;
+#define EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4 (1U << 0)
+#define EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4 (1U << 1)
+#define EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6 (1U << 2)
+#define EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6 (1U << 3)
+
+typedef unsigned int efx_rx_hash_type_t;
typedef enum efx_rx_hash_support_e {
EFX_RX_HASH_UNAVAILABLE = 0, /* Hardware hash not inserted */
@@ -786,12 +786,12 @@ siena_rx_scale_mode_set(
case EFX_RX_HASHALG_TOEPLITZ:
EFX_RX_TOEPLITZ_IPV4_HASH(enp, insert,
- type & (1 << EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4),
- type & (1 << EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4));
+ type & EFX_RX_HASH_IPV4,
+ type & EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV4);
EFX_RX_TOEPLITZ_IPV6_HASH(enp,
- type & (1 << EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6),
- type & (1 << EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6),
+ type & EFX_RX_HASH_IPV6,
+ type & EFX_RX_HASH_TCPIPV6,
rc);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail1;