[dpdk-dev,v2,1/2] ixgbe: VF supports mailbox interruption for PF link up/down

Message ID 1464745989-28280-2-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: Bruce Richardson
Headers

Commit Message

Wenzhuo Lu June 1, 2016, 1:53 a.m. UTC
  In this scenario, kernel PF + DPDK VF, when PF finds the link
state changes, up -> down or down -> up, it will send a
message to VF by mailbox. This link state change may be
triggered by PHY disconnection/reconnection, configuration
like *ifconfig down/up* or interface parameter, like MTU,
change.
This patch enables the support of the mailbox interruption,
so VF can receive the message of link up/down.
After VF receives this message, VF port need to be reset to
recover. So the handler of this message registers a reset
callback to let APP reset the VF port.

Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst |  6 +++
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c       | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Jingjing Wu June 2, 2016, 3:38 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:53 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing; Lu, Wenzhuo
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ixgbe: VF supports mailbox interruption for PF link
> up/down
> 
> In this scenario, kernel PF + DPDK VF, when PF finds the link state changes,
> up -> down or down -> up, it will send a message to VF by mailbox. This link
> state change may be triggered by PHY disconnection/reconnection,
> configuration like *ifconfig down/up* or interface parameter, like MTU,
> change.
> This patch enables the support of the mailbox interruption, so VF can receive
> the message of link up/down.
> After VF receives this message, VF port need to be reset to recover. So the
> handler of this message registers a reset callback to let APP reset the VF port.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
  
Bruce Richardson June 14, 2016, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:53:08AM +0800, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
> In this scenario, kernel PF + DPDK VF, when PF finds the link
> state changes, up -> down or down -> up, it will send a
> message to VF by mailbox. This link state change may be
> triggered by PHY disconnection/reconnection, configuration
> like *ifconfig down/up* or interface parameter, like MTU,
> change.
> This patch enables the support of the mailbox interruption,
> so VF can receive the message of link up/down.
> After VF receives this message, VF port need to be reset to
> recover. So the handler of this message registers a reset
> callback to let APP reset the VF port.
> 
Hi Wenzhuo,

I'm a little unclear as to the last paragraph of this message. Does the
app configure the callback to handle the reset, or does the driver set
up a callback automatically and handle the event itself? [In other words,
who/what is the "handler" in the final sentence, the driver or the app?]

Thanks,
/Bruce
  
Wenzhuo Lu June 15, 2016, 12:57 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Bruce,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 12:54 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ixgbe: VF supports mailbox
> interruption for PF link up/down
> 
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:53:08AM +0800, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
> > In this scenario, kernel PF + DPDK VF, when PF finds the link state
> > changes, up -> down or down -> up, it will send a message to VF by
> > mailbox. This link state change may be triggered by PHY
> > disconnection/reconnection, configuration like *ifconfig down/up* or
> > interface parameter, like MTU, change.
> > This patch enables the support of the mailbox interruption, so VF can
> > receive the message of link up/down.
> > After VF receives this message, VF port need to be reset to recover.
> > So the handler of this message registers a reset callback to let APP
> > reset the VF port.
> >
> Hi Wenzhuo,
> 
> I'm a little unclear as to the last paragraph of this message. Does the app
> configure the callback to handle the reset, or does the driver set up a
> callback automatically and handle the event itself? [In other words,
> who/what is the "handler" in the final sentence, the driver or the app?]
Sorry, I may not make it clear. The handler is the APP.  In the code, _rte_eth_dev_callback_process is used for the message. It's the APP's responsibility to realize the callback function and decide what to do with the message.

> 
> Thanks,
> /Bruce
  

Patch

diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst
index 30e78d4..990bd46 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst
@@ -47,6 +47,12 @@  New Features
   * Dropped specific Xen Dom0 code.
   * Dropped specific anonymous mempool code in testpmd.
 
+* **Added mailbox interruption support for ixgbe VF.**
+
+  When the link becomes down or up, PF will use mailbox message to notice
+  VF. To handle this link up/down event, add the mailbox interruption
+  support to receive the message.
+
 
 Resolved Issues
 ---------------
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
index a2b170b..05f4f29 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ 
 #define IXGBE_VMVIR_TAGA_ETAG_INSERT           0x08000000
 #define IXGBE_VMTIR(_i) (0x00017000 + ((_i) * 4)) /* 64 of these (0-63) */
 #define IXGBE_QDE_STRIP_TAG                    0x00000004
+#define IXGBE_VTEICR_MASK                      0x07
 
 enum ixgbevf_xcast_modes {
 	IXGBEVF_XCAST_MODE_NONE = 0,
@@ -361,6 +362,8 @@  static int ixgbe_timesync_read_time(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				   struct timespec *timestamp);
 static int ixgbe_timesync_write_time(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				   const struct timespec *timestamp);
+static void ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_handler(struct rte_intr_handle *handle,
+					  void *param);
 
 static int ixgbe_dev_l2_tunnel_eth_type_conf
 	(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_l2_tunnel_conf *l2_tunnel);
@@ -1442,6 +1445,12 @@  eth_ixgbevf_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
+	rte_intr_callback_register(&pci_dev->intr_handle,
+				   ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_handler,
+				   (void *)eth_dev);
+	rte_intr_enable(&pci_dev->intr_handle);
+	ixgbevf_intr_enable(hw);
+
 	PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "port %d vendorID=0x%x deviceID=0x%x mac.type=%s",
 		     eth_dev->data->port_id, pci_dev->id.vendor_id,
 		     pci_dev->id.device_id, "ixgbe_mac_82599_vf");
@@ -1455,6 +1464,7 @@  static int
 eth_ixgbevf_dev_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
 {
 	struct ixgbe_hw *hw;
+	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = eth_dev->pci_dev;
 
 	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
 
@@ -1476,6 +1486,11 @@  eth_ixgbevf_dev_uninit(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
 	rte_free(eth_dev->data->mac_addrs);
 	eth_dev->data->mac_addrs = NULL;
 
+	rte_intr_disable(&pci_dev->intr_handle);
+	rte_intr_callback_unregister(&pci_dev->intr_handle,
+				     ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_handler,
+				     (void *)eth_dev);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4074,6 +4089,8 @@  ixgbevf_dev_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 
 	PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
 
+	ixgbevf_intr_disable(hw);
+
 	hw->adapter_stopped = 1;
 	ixgbe_stop_adapter(hw);
 
@@ -4818,6 +4835,9 @@  ixgbevf_configure_msix(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 	uint32_t q_idx;
 	uint32_t vector_idx = IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID;
 
+	/* Configure VF other cause ivar */
+	ixgbevf_set_ivar_map(hw, -1, 1, vector_idx);
+
 	/* won't configure msix register if no mapping is done
 	 * between intr vector and event fd.
 	 */
@@ -4832,9 +4852,6 @@  ixgbevf_configure_msix(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 		ixgbevf_set_ivar_map(hw, 0, q_idx, vector_idx);
 		intr_handle->intr_vec[q_idx] = vector_idx;
 	}
-
-	/* Configure VF other cause ivar */
-	ixgbevf_set_ivar_map(hw, -1, 1, vector_idx);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -7154,6 +7171,67 @@  ixgbevf_dev_allmulticast_disable(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
 	ixgbevf_update_xcast_mode(hw, IXGBEVF_XCAST_MODE_NONE);
 }
 
+static void ixgbevf_mbx_process(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
+	u32 in_msg = 0;
+
+	if (ixgbe_read_mbx(hw, &in_msg, 1, 0))
+		return;
+
+	/* PF reset VF event */
+	if (in_msg == IXGBE_PF_CONTROL_MSG)
+		_rte_eth_dev_callback_process(dev, RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET);
+}
+
+static int
+ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_get_status(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
+{
+	uint32_t eicr;
+	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
+	struct ixgbe_interrupt *intr =
+		IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_INTR(dev->data->dev_private);
+	ixgbevf_intr_disable(hw);
+
+	/* read-on-clear nic registers here */
+	eicr = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEICR);
+	intr->flags = 0;
+
+	/* only one misc vector supported - mailbox */
+	eicr &= IXGBE_VTEICR_MASK;
+	if (eicr == IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID)
+		intr->flags |= IXGBE_FLAG_MAILBOX;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_action(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
+	struct ixgbe_interrupt *intr =
+		IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_INTR(dev->data->dev_private);
+
+	if (intr->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_MAILBOX) {
+		ixgbevf_mbx_process(dev);
+		intr->flags &= ~IXGBE_FLAG_MAILBOX;
+	}
+
+	ixgbevf_intr_enable(hw);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_handler(__rte_unused struct rte_intr_handle *handle,
+			      void *param)
+{
+	struct rte_eth_dev *dev = (struct rte_eth_dev *)param;
+
+	ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_get_status(dev);
+	ixgbevf_dev_interrupt_action(dev);
+}
+
 static struct rte_driver rte_ixgbe_driver = {
 	.type = PMD_PDEV,
 	.init = rte_ixgbe_pmd_init,