[dpdk-dev,v2] enic: fix incorrect setting of rx descriptor limit
Commit Message
From: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
On initialization, the rq descriptor count was set to the limit
of the vic. When the requested number of rx descriptors was
less than this count, enic_alloc_rq() was incorrectly setting
the count to the lower value. This results in later calls to
enic_alloc_rq() incorrectly using the lower value as the adapter
limit.
Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
Fixes: fefed3d1e62c ("enic: new driver")
Reviewed-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
---
fix checkin comment
drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Comments
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:33:34AM -0700, John Daley wrote:
> From: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
>
> On initialization, the rq descriptor count was set to the limit
> of the vic. When the requested number of rx descriptors was
> less than this count, enic_alloc_rq() was incorrectly setting
> the count to the lower value. This results in later calls to
> enic_alloc_rq() incorrectly using the lower value as the adapter
> limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
> Fixes: fefed3d1e62c ("enic: new driver")
> Reviewed-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
Please put the fixes line above the signoffs, not in the middle of them. It just
makes it easier to read. I'll fix this for this patch when applying it.
/Bruce
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:32:41PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:33:34AM -0700, John Daley wrote:
> > From: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
> >
> > On initialization, the rq descriptor count was set to the limit
> > of the vic. When the requested number of rx descriptors was
> > less than this count, enic_alloc_rq() was incorrectly setting
> > the count to the lower value. This results in later calls to
> > enic_alloc_rq() incorrectly using the lower value as the adapter
> > limit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
> > Fixes: fefed3d1e62c ("enic: new driver")
> > Reviewed-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
>
> Please put the fixes line above the signoffs, not in the middle of them. It just
> makes it easier to read. I'll fix this for this patch when applying it.
>
> /Bruce
Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04
/Bruce
@@ -524,24 +524,22 @@ int enic_alloc_rq(struct enic *enic, uint16_t queue_idx,
"policy. Applying the value in the adapter "\
"policy (%d).\n",
queue_idx, nb_desc, enic->config.rq_desc_count);
- } else if (nb_desc != enic->config.rq_desc_count) {
- enic->config.rq_desc_count = nb_desc;
- dev_info(enic,
- "RX Queues - effective number of descs:%d\n",
- nb_desc);
+ nb_desc = enic->config.rq_desc_count;
}
+ dev_info(enic, "RX Queues - effective number of descs:%d\n",
+ nb_desc);
}
/* Allocate queue resources */
rc = vnic_rq_alloc(enic->vdev, rq, queue_idx,
- enic->config.rq_desc_count, sizeof(struct rq_enet_desc));
+ nb_desc, sizeof(struct rq_enet_desc));
if (rc) {
dev_err(enic, "error in allocation of rq\n");
goto err_exit;
}
rc = vnic_cq_alloc(enic->vdev, &enic->cq[queue_idx], queue_idx,
- socket_id, enic->config.rq_desc_count,
+ socket_id, nb_desc,
sizeof(struct cq_enet_rq_desc));
if (rc) {
dev_err(enic, "error in allocation of cq for rq\n");
@@ -550,7 +548,7 @@ int enic_alloc_rq(struct enic *enic, uint16_t queue_idx,
/* Allocate the mbuf ring */
rq->mbuf_ring = (struct rte_mbuf **)rte_zmalloc_socket("rq->mbuf_ring",
- sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *) * enic->config.rq_desc_count,
+ sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *) * nb_desc,
RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, rq->socket_id);
if (rq->mbuf_ring != NULL)