[dpdk-dev,1/2] ixgbe: fix VF statistic wraparound handling macro
Commit Message
Fix a misinterpretation of VF stats in ixgbe
Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
ack
On 10/12/15 9:33 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> Fix a misinterpretation of VF stats in ixgbe
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index ec2918c..d226e8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -329,10 +329,14 @@ static int ixgbe_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> /*
> * Define VF Stats MACRO for Non "cleared on read" register
> */
> -#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
> +#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
> { \
> uint32_t latest = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, reg); \
> - cur += latest - last; \
> + if(likely(latest > last)) { \
> + cur += latest - last; \
> + } else { \
> + cur += (UINT_MAX - last) + latest; \
> + } \
> last = latest; \
> }
>
On 10/12/2015 06:33 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> Fix a misinterpretation of VF stats in ixgbe
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> index ec2918c..d226e8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -329,10 +329,14 @@ static int ixgbe_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> /*
> * Define VF Stats MACRO for Non "cleared on read" register
> */
> -#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
> +#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
> { \
> uint32_t latest = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, reg); \
> - cur += latest - last; \
> + if(likely(latest > last)) { \
> + cur += latest - last; \
> + } else { \
> + cur += (UINT_MAX - last) + latest; \
> + } \
> last = latest; \
> }
>
From what I can tell your math is adding an off by one error. You
should probably be using UINT_MAX as a mask for the result, not as a
part of the calculation itself.
So the correct way to compute this would be "cur += (latest - last) &
UINT_MAX". Also the mask approach should be faster as it avoids any
conditional jumps.
- Alex
The following two patches fix a misinterpretation of the cyclic
counters of igb and ixgbe VF. When the 32bit value wraps around,
the code now handles the wrapped new value appropriatly.
v2:
- Reimplemented with Alex's suggested fix for off-by-one
v1:
- Initial implementation
Harry van Haaren (2):
ixgbe: fix VF statistic wraparound handling macro
igb: fix VF statistic wraparound handling macro
drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c | 3 +--
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Agreed, this handles the off by one error on wrap around and should be
faster.
-Roger
On 10/12/15 11:41 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 06:33 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
>> Fix a misinterpretation of VF stats in ixgbe
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>> index ec2918c..d226e8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>> @@ -329,10 +329,14 @@ static int
>> ixgbe_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> /*
>> * Define VF Stats MACRO for Non "cleared on read" register
>> */
>> -#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
>> +#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
>> { \
>> uint32_t latest = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, reg); \
>> - cur += latest - last; \
>> + if(likely(latest > last)) { \
>> + cur += latest - last; \
>> + } else { \
>> + cur += (UINT_MAX - last) + latest; \
>> + } \
>> last = latest; \
>> }
>
> From what I can tell your math is adding an off by one error. You
> should probably be using UINT_MAX as a mask for the result, not as a
> part of the calculation itself.
>
> So the correct way to compute this would be "cur += (latest - last) &
> UINT_MAX". Also the mask approach should be faster as it avoids any
> conditional jumps.
>
> - Alex
> .
>
2015-10-12 17:45, Harry van Haaren:
> The following two patches fix a misinterpretation of the cyclic
> counters of igb and ixgbe VF. When the 32bit value wraps around,
> the code now handles the wrapped new value appropriatly.
>
> v2:
> - Reimplemented with Alex's suggested fix for off-by-one
>
> v1:
> - Initial implementation
>
> Harry van Haaren (2):
> ixgbe: fix VF statistic wraparound handling macro
> igb: fix VF statistic wraparound handling macro
Applied (with spacing fixes), thanks
@@ -329,10 +329,14 @@ static int ixgbe_timesync_read_tx_timestamp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
/*
* Define VF Stats MACRO for Non "cleared on read" register
*/
-#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
+#define UPDATE_VF_STAT(reg, last, cur) \
{ \
uint32_t latest = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, reg); \
- cur += latest - last; \
+ if(likely(latest > last)) { \
+ cur += latest - last; \
+ } else { \
+ cur += (UINT_MAX - last) + latest; \
+ } \
last = latest; \
}