[dpdk-dev,v2,5/6] cfgfile: fixed calling free for each section in rte_cfgfile_close
Commit Message
From: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_cfgfile/rte_cfgfile.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Comments
2015-06-17 16:48, Maciej Gajdzica:
> From: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
What is fixed exactly? What was the problem?
> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ struct rte_cfgfile {
> * for new entries do we add in */
> #define CFG_ALLOC_ENTRY_BATCH 16
>
> +/* Helpers */
> +
> +#define _skip_spaceses(str) ({ \
> + __typeof__(str) p = (str); \
> + while (isspace(*p)) \
> + p++; \
> + p; \
> +})
This macro is not used in this patch nor related.
Is "spaceses" a typo?
> @@ -523,7 +530,7 @@ const char *
> rte_cfgfile_get_entry(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname,
> const char *entryname)
> {
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
Why this change? seems not related to free.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:30 PM
> To: Wodkowski, PawelX
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gajdzica, MaciejX T
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] cfgfile: fixed calling free for each section
> in rte_cfgfile_close
>
> 2015-06-17 16:48, Maciej Gajdzica:
> > From: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
>
> What is fixed exactly? What was the problem?
I will merge this patch with 6th patch in the series. Freeing memory is changed because structure
that is freed changed and this change belongs to next patch in the series.
>
> > @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ struct rte_cfgfile {
> > * for new entries do we add in */
> > #define CFG_ALLOC_ENTRY_BATCH 16
> >
> > +/* Helpers */
> > +
> > +#define _skip_spaceses(str) ({ \
> > + __typeof__(str) p = (str); \
> > + while (isspace(*p)) \
> > + p++; \
> > + p; \
> > +})
>
> This macro is not used in this patch nor related.
> Is "spaceses" a typo?
Yes it's a typo, thanks.
>
> > @@ -523,7 +530,7 @@ const char *
> > rte_cfgfile_get_entry(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname,
> > const char *entryname)
> > {
> > - int i;
> > + size_t i;
>
> Why this change? seems not related to free.
>
num_entries and num_sections variables changed type from int to size_t and now comparison with
i produces warning when compiling.
@@ -43,13 +43,13 @@
struct rte_cfgfile_section {
char name[CFG_NAME_LEN];
- int num_entries;
+ size_t num_entries;
struct rte_cfgfile_entry *entries[0];
};
struct rte_cfgfile {
int flags;
- int num_sections;
+ size_t num_sections;
struct rte_cfgfile_section *sections[0];
};
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ struct rte_cfgfile {
* for new entries do we add in */
#define CFG_ALLOC_ENTRY_BATCH 16
+/* Helpers */
+
+#define _skip_spaceses(str) ({ \
+ __typeof__(str) p = (str); \
+ while (isspace(*p)) \
+ p++; \
+ p; \
+})
+
static unsigned
_strip(char *str, unsigned len)
{
@@ -424,28 +433,26 @@ rte_cfgfile_load(const char *filename, int flags)
return cfg;
}
-
-int rte_cfgfile_close(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg)
+int
+rte_cfgfile_close(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg)
{
- int i, j;
+ struct rte_cfgfile_section *s;
+ size_t i, j;
if (cfg == NULL)
return -1;
for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sections; i++) {
- if (cfg->sections[i] != NULL) {
- if (cfg->sections[i]->num_entries) {
- for (j = 0; j < cfg->sections[i]->num_entries;
- j++) {
- if (cfg->sections[i]->entries[j] !=
- NULL)
- free(cfg->sections[i]->
- entries[j]);
- }
- }
- free(cfg->sections[i]);
+ s = cfg->sections[i];
+ for (j = 0; j < s->num_entries; j++) {
+ free(cfg->sections[i]->entries[j]->value);
+ free(cfg->sections[i]->entries[j]);
}
+ free(cfg->sections[i]->entries);
+ free(s);
}
+
+ free(cfg->sections);
free(cfg);
return 0;
@@ -455,7 +462,7 @@ int
rte_cfgfile_num_sections(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname,
size_t length)
{
- int i;
+ size_t i;
int num_sections = 0;
for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sections; i++) {
if (strncmp(cfg->sections[i]->name, sectionname, length) == 0)
@@ -468,9 +475,9 @@ int
rte_cfgfile_sections(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, char *sections[],
int max_sections)
{
- int i;
+ size_t i;
- for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sections && i < max_sections; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sections && (int)i < max_sections; i++)
snprintf(sections[i], CFG_NAME_LEN, "%s",
cfg->sections[i]->name);
@@ -480,7 +487,7 @@ rte_cfgfile_sections(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, char *sections[],
static const struct rte_cfgfile_section *
_get_section(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname)
{
- int i;
+ size_t i;
for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sections; i++) {
if (strncmp(cfg->sections[i]->name, sectionname,
sizeof(cfg->sections[0]->name)) == 0)
@@ -510,11 +517,11 @@ int
rte_cfgfile_section_entries(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname,
struct rte_cfgfile_entry *entries, int max_entries)
{
- int i;
+ size_t i;
const struct rte_cfgfile_section *sect = _get_section(cfg, sectionname);
if (sect == NULL)
return -1;
- for (i = 0; i < max_entries && i < sect->num_entries; i++)
+ for (i = 0; (int)i < max_entries && i < sect->num_entries; i++)
entries[i] = *sect->entries[i];
return i;
}
@@ -523,7 +530,7 @@ const char *
rte_cfgfile_get_entry(struct rte_cfgfile *cfg, const char *sectionname,
const char *entryname)
{
- int i;
+ size_t i;
const struct rte_cfgfile_section *sect = _get_section(cfg, sectionname);
if (sect == NULL)
return NULL;