diff mbox

[dpdk-dev,v6,04/10] test/hash: change order of loops in hash function tests

Message ID 1433949927-14767-5-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers

Commit Message

De Lara Guarch, Pablo June 10, 2015, 3:25 p.m. UTC 
  In order to see more clearly the performance difference
between different hash functions, order of the loops
have been changed, so it iterates first through initial values,
then key sizes and then the hash functions.

Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_hash_functions.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_functions.c b/app/test/test_hash_functions.c
index aff5e6d..5156dfc 100644
--- a/app/test/test_hash_functions.c
+++ b/app/test/test_hash_functions.c
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@  get_hash_name(rte_hash_function f)
  * Test a hash function.
  */
 static void
-run_hash_func_perf_test(rte_hash_function f, uint32_t init_val,
-		uint32_t key_len)
+run_hash_func_perf_test(uint32_t key_len, uint32_t init_val,
+		rte_hash_function f)
 {
 	static uint8_t key[HASHTEST_ITERATIONS][RTE_HASH_KEY_LENGTH_MAX];
 	uint64_t ticks, start, end;
@@ -121,12 +121,12 @@  run_hash_func_perf_tests(void)
 			HASHTEST_ITERATIONS);
 	printf("Hash Func.  , Key Length (bytes), Initial value, Ticks/Op.\n");
 
-	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(hashtest_funcs); i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < RTE_DIM(hashtest_initvals); j++) {
-			for (k = 0; k < RTE_DIM(hashtest_key_lens); k++) {
-				run_hash_func_perf_test(hashtest_funcs[i],
-						hashtest_initvals[j],
-						hashtest_key_lens[k]);
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(hashtest_initvals); i++) {
+		for (j = 0; j < RTE_DIM(hashtest_key_lens); j++) {
+			for (k = 0; k < RTE_DIM(hashtest_funcs); k++) {
+				run_hash_func_perf_test(hashtest_key_lens[j],
+						hashtest_initvals[i],
+						hashtest_funcs[k]);
 			}
 		}
 	}