diff mbox

[dpdk-dev,v2] test: fix missing NULL pointer checks

Message ID 1422368268-10068-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Daniel Mrzyglod Jan. 27, 2015, 2:17 p.m. UTC
In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after calls to create the
mempool and to allocate an mbuf. Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL macros.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_sched.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Thomas Monjalon Jan. 27, 2015, 2:21 p.m. UTC | #1
2015-01-27 15:17, Daniel Mrzyglod:
> In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after calls to create the
> mempool and to allocate an mbuf. Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL macros.

You are adding checks *and* replacing VERIFY by TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL.
It would be better to explain why you do these replacements.

Please don't forget to answer the "why" question in the commit logs.

Thanks
Thomas Monjalon Jan. 27, 2015, 2:42 p.m. UTC | #2
2015-01-27 15:17, Daniel Mrzyglod:
> In test_sched, we are missing NULL pointer checks after calls to create the
> mempool and to allocate an mbuf. Add in these checks using TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL macros.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
[...]
> +	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mp, "Error create mempool\n");

Asked previously (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-December/010392.html),
it seems to be a typo: create -> creating
Sorry to insist but I'm not an english native and it seems weird to me.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/app/test/test_sched.c b/app/test/test_sched.c
index c957d80..83dccd2 100644
--- a/app/test/test_sched.c
+++ b/app/test/test_sched.c
@@ -166,48 +166,49 @@  test_sched(void)
 	int err;
 
 	mp = create_mempool();
+	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(mp, "Error create mempool\n");
 
 	port_param.socket = 0;
 	port_param.rate = (uint64_t) 10000 * 1000 * 1000 / 8;
 
 	port = rte_sched_port_config(&port_param);
-	VERIFY(port != NULL, "Error config sched port\n");
-
+	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(port, "Error config sched port\n");
 
 	err = rte_sched_subport_config(port, SUBPORT, subport_param);
-	VERIFY(err == 0, "Error config sched, err=%d\n", err);
+	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err, "Error config sched, err=%d\n", err);
 
 	for (pipe = 0; pipe < port_param.n_pipes_per_subport; pipe ++) {
 		err = rte_sched_pipe_config(port, SUBPORT, pipe, 0);
-		VERIFY(err == 0, "Error config sched pipe %u, err=%d\n", pipe, err);
+		TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(err, "Error config sched pipe %u, err=%d\n", pipe, err);
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 		in_mbufs[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
+		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(in_mbufs[i], "Packet allocation failed\n");
 		prepare_pkt(in_mbufs[i]);
 	}
 
 
 	err = rte_sched_port_enqueue(port, in_mbufs, 10);
-	VERIFY(err == 10, "Wrong enqueue, err=%d\n", err);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, 10, "Wrong enqueue, err=%d\n", err);
 
 	err = rte_sched_port_dequeue(port, out_mbufs, 10);
-	VERIFY(err == 10, "Wrong dequeue, err=%d\n", err);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(err, 10, "Wrong dequeue, err=%d\n", err);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 		enum rte_meter_color color;
 		uint32_t subport, traffic_class, queue;
 
 		color = rte_sched_port_pkt_read_color(out_mbufs[i]);
-		VERIFY(color == e_RTE_METER_YELLOW, "Wrong color\n");
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(color, e_RTE_METER_YELLOW, "Wrong color\n");
 
 		rte_sched_port_pkt_read_tree_path(out_mbufs[i],
 				&subport, &pipe, &traffic_class, &queue);
 
-		VERIFY(subport == SUBPORT, "Wrong subport\n");
-		VERIFY(pipe == PIPE, "Wrong pipe\n");
-		VERIFY(traffic_class == TC, "Wrong traffic_class\n");
-		VERIFY(queue == QUEUE, "Wrong queue\n");
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(subport, SUBPORT, "Wrong subport\n");
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(pipe, PIPE, "Wrong pipe\n");
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(traffic_class, TC, "Wrong traffic_class\n");
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(queue, QUEUE, "Wrong queue\n");
 
 	}