Message ID | 20210503164344.27916-1-david.marchand@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C80AA09E4; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B5F40150; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC37E4014E for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 18:44:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620060241; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8TfslKEfGTpEDfBvVdHAO+HvW77yy1BLKk6pQtkxXCQ=; b=OHg1TNe6XbESzYpDraRC+iXYs2FDIx+cf0ZWba+W+r0tZS4J28WT2qOmYnPa/ONbmvY/gy so4H4uiUR+1/3k0tOFv4Y9LIgRHpq3UHtZki4xqLaEtkup5h6PNLifOZeBdcZID+WExwuP FJ33eoYpmHZ3idXC4bnOVolx7EgjScI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-315-M1fobQl8PKiNsZDZ7lyYoA-1; Mon, 03 May 2021 12:43:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: M1fobQl8PKiNsZDZ7lyYoA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B10A1008062; Mon, 3 May 2021 16:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.remote.csb (unknown [10.40.192.99]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A1519D7C; Mon, 3 May 2021 16:43:49 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, fbl@sysclose.org, i.maximets@ovn.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, ian.stokes@intel.com Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 18:43:41 +0200 Message-Id: <20210503164344.27916-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210401095243.18211-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> References: <20210401095243.18211-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david.marchand@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Offload flags fixes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> |
Series | Offload flags fixes | |
Message
David Marchand
May 3, 2021, 4:43 p.m. UTC
The important part is the last patch on vhost handling of offloading requests coming from a virtio guest interface. The rest are small fixes that I accumulated while reviewing the mbuf offload flags. On this last patch, it has the potential of breaking existing applications using the vhost library (OVS being impacted). I did not mark it for backport. Changes since v3: - patch 1 went through the main repo, - rebased on next-virtio, Changes since v2: - kept behavior untouched (to avoid breaking ABI) and introduced a new flag to select the new behavior, Changes since v1: - dropped patch on net/tap, - added missing bits in example/vhost, - relaxed checks on VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP,
Comments
On 5/3/21 6:43 PM, David Marchand wrote: > The important part is the last patch on vhost handling of offloading > requests coming from a virtio guest interface. > > The rest are small fixes that I accumulated while reviewing the mbuf > offload flags. > > On this last patch, it has the potential of breaking existing > applications using the vhost library (OVS being impacted). > I did not mark it for backport. > > Changes since v3: > - patch 1 went through the main repo, > - rebased on next-virtio, > > Changes since v2: > - kept behavior untouched (to avoid breaking ABI) and introduced a new > flag to select the new behavior, > > Changes since v1: > - dropped patch on net/tap, > - added missing bits in example/vhost, > - relaxed checks on VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN and VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_UDP, > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/main. Thanks, Maxime