From patchwork Thu Apr 1 09:52:38 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Marchand X-Patchwork-Id: 90343 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF87A0548; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:55:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8A3140EB3; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:53:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ABD140E5E for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:53:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617270781; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NFgl6XsTYWXol3fiw/yy08sHQJ1hbvyomAtsBYcOyw0=; b=FQ723KFYSTrhZN5w5ktfREXKR2UCJWue245GDvnbZ/MWPiyQ3rbEzB+vq9S0w//jnKESKF C5CRCbBx8lBeixBVnzHblxPjZsMhYP72kyWdKPumUNP/dMy7q79HWexEppfAyA58gHH4bb Q9cAQbfHJz1Bw55YfWiKa+rqc5VLNA8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-56-yulreR-0MKSdc9PmD4hbrg-1; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 05:53:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yulreR-0MKSdc9PmD4hbrg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984D0501FF; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.remote.csb (unknown [10.40.193.239]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADD55D9CA; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:52:52 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, fbl@sysclose.org, i.maximets@ovn.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:52:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20210401095243.18211-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david.marchand@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] Offload flags fixes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The important part is the last patch on vhost handling of offloading requests coming from a virtio guest interface. The rest are small fixes that I accumulated while reviewing the mbuf offload flags. On this last patch, it has the potential of breaking existing applications using the vhost library (OVS being impacted). I did not mark it for backport, but I am having second thoughts. The vhost example has not been updated yet, as I wanted to send this series first to get feedback before looking more into the example code.