mbox series

[v2,0/2] add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2 security

Message ID 20200918110943.14553-1-adwivedi@marvell.com (mailing list archive)
Headers
Series add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2 security |

Message

Ankur Dwivedi Sept. 18, 2020, 11:09 a.m. UTC
  Support for anti replay is added in OCTEON TX2 security PMD.
The functionality has been tested with ipsec-secgw application running
in inline protocol offload mode.

v2:
* In the "net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets"
  patch, few local variables are explicitly initialized to zero which
  is not required. So removing the initialization in v2.

Ankur Dwivedi (2):
  net/octeontx2: add anti replay support in security session
  net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets

 .../crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h | 208 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_fp.h      |  29 ++-
 drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_security.h      |   3 +
 drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_ethdev_sec.c       |  42 ++++
 drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_rx.h               |   7 +
 5 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h
  

Comments

Ankur Dwivedi Oct. 9, 2020, 1:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Akhil,

Please let me know if you have any review comments on this patch series.

Thanks
Ankur

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 4:40 PM
>To: dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com;
>radu.nicolau@intel.com; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Ankur
>Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2 security
>
>Support for anti replay is added in OCTEON TX2 security PMD.
>The functionality has been tested with ipsec-secgw application running in
>inline protocol offload mode.
>
>v2:
>* In the "net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets"
>  patch, few local variables are explicitly initialized to zero which
>  is not required. So removing the initialization in v2.
>
>Ankur Dwivedi (2):
>  net/octeontx2: add anti replay support in security session
>  net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets
>
> .../crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h | 208 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_fp.h      |  29 ++-
> drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_security.h      |   3 +
> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_ethdev_sec.c       |  42 ++++
> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_rx.h               |   7 +
> 5 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
>drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h
>
>--
>2.28.0
  
Ankur Dwivedi Oct. 9, 2020, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #2
Adding Akhil in the to list of the email. 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ankur Dwivedi
>Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 7:17 PM
>To: 'Ankur Dwivedi' <adwivedi@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; akhil.goyal@nxp.com;
>radu.nicolau@intel.com; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
>Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2 security
>
>Hi Akhil,
>
>Please let me know if you have any review comments on this patch series.
>
>Thanks
>Ankur
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>>Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 4:40 PM
>>To: dev@dpdk.org
>>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
>>akhil.goyal@nxp.com; radu.nicolau@intel.com; Anoob Joseph
>><anoobj@marvell.com>; Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>>Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2 security
>>
>>Support for anti replay is added in OCTEON TX2 security PMD.
>>The functionality has been tested with ipsec-secgw application running
>>in inline protocol offload mode.
>>
>>v2:
>>* In the "net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets"
>>  patch, few local variables are explicitly initialized to zero which
>>  is not required. So removing the initialization in v2.
>>
>>Ankur Dwivedi (2):
>>  net/octeontx2: add anti replay support in security session
>>  net/octeontx2: add replay check for inline inbound packets
>>
>> .../crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h | 208 ++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_fp.h      |  29 ++-
>> drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_security.h      |   3 +
>> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_ethdev_sec.c       |  42 ++++
>> drivers/net/octeontx2/otx2_rx.h               |   7 +
>> 5 files changed, 286 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
>>drivers/crypto/octeontx2/otx2_ipsec_anti_replay.h
>>
>>--
>>2.28.0
  
Akhil Goyal Oct. 9, 2020, 2:54 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Ankur,


> >Hi Akhil,
> >
> >Please let me know if you have any review comments on this patch series.
> >

I am working on the crypto tree. These patches are in my back log and
will let you know if I face some issues.
These patches are PMD patches and are 2nd on my priority list and can go in RC2.
However will try my best to accommodate most of the patches in RC1.

Regards,
Akhil
  
Ankur Dwivedi Oct. 9, 2020, 3:13 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Akhil,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
>Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 8:24 PM
>To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; radu.nicolau@intel.com;
>Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
>Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] add anti replay support in OCTEON TX2
>security
>
>External Email
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hi Ankur,
>
>
>> >Hi Akhil,
>> >
>> >Please let me know if you have any review comments on this patch series.
>> >
>
>I am working on the crypto tree. These patches are in my back log and will let
>you know if I face some issues.
>These patches are PMD patches and are 2nd on my priority list and can go in
>RC2.
>However will try my best to accommodate most of the patches in RC1.
>
Thanks for the information.  

Regards
Ankur
>Regards,
>Akhil
  
Akhil Goyal Oct. 9, 2020, 6:54 p.m. UTC | #5
> >
> >> >Hi Akhil,
> >> >
> >> >Please let me know if you have any review comments on this patch series.
> >> >
> >
> >I am working on the crypto tree. These patches are in my back log and will let
> >you know if I face some issues.
> >These patches are PMD patches and are 2nd on my priority list and can go in
> >RC2.
> >However will try my best to accommodate most of the patches in RC1.
> >
> Thanks for the information.
> 
Series Applied to dpdk-next-crypto

Thanks.