Message ID | 20241008192543.800702-1-probb@iol.unh.edu (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Rejected |
Headers |
Return-Path: <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> X-Original-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Delivered-To: patchwork@inbox.dpdk.org Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9A745AE9; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B3240261; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:27:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com (mail-qt1-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748C04025D for <ci@dpdk.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:27:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4582c4aa2c2so43055251cf.0 for <ci@dpdk.org>; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:27:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1728415639; x=1729020439; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DO2q/uWMz5SuCp9vWM3sZmRWGq3qwxxrl30K7OzhZLY=; b=VPLn3ycV7YWDLNvuJPBW47O7SfEa6CU1aBHWlgEIJMuIxdF6ztoIXFYB8xy/Od67yM kYC5swcSTsqT7TUtHGEG4oKcY0BtNeweT7Ca09PTq0AAU5MppIg8e+pjJfGWB9o1wwrS K1omr7FQ+iqd4jRDfCZQvBkBNduy29CGRed5w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728415639; x=1729020439; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=DO2q/uWMz5SuCp9vWM3sZmRWGq3qwxxrl30K7OzhZLY=; b=h5z/P7UoKuBhUv+ddLEm2d7Rs0c7kiG59OtHpvXjVspiAQg6yMu4G8e5c3xXYXipwe 3naPaUuhLvcRfgtkXgelXlQQgy5Th0/OlUEE/pQzIoRMFygCitFVecd3KHkk46VLIImz 50u0l+uBj5P0whRcnniYPZa9d1WQxSm6uimrsdJopDAbAmRfcxFWhoa5pq/BsK+mFJZ4 FBp7Jh+cNRujXE9rnJldvHhiXwIPpv/5hSau9ojnpqKBverRpGje9uhlv6ZL42qyfcVw RKR4lIvs+vPxkZag9pBEPj3U7hJ7fXTmXibI8UyScnFHhidmLdPgZuMZVPU5JUThM0Vv Yp0A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUNLvmG/6+AMOUSo0gc4qK/2vcWz+7p6SsEeBXdrrI3fo7n0NdH5yzxjkgh1Ro4wM2wfA==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy3iZtd+I4XooWS/dfy7DNP3h7gcdoz02LltEao4gp+SCGHwFFf LwucOoeJZSHgNQH2DBq4QFa+vt+Gw0Da4/BAr7LPan/YYOPHLgjjoQkkTQX7ekg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCRy+KRZ8Jty/WqgdecUyavTDu9TEFDFdP1MOX+PelGXob+3ljIT8Q5YMSVYbDrH0CAaI6Xg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:4a07:b0:45d:8e45:762b with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-45d9ba2efd5mr239390901cf.10.1728415638674; Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.unh.edu ([2606:4100:3880:1271:8c70:5b9e:ecd3:14e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-45da755647asm39315351cf.41.2024.10.08.12.27.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Oct 2024 12:27:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, zhoumin@loongson.cn, aconole@redhat.com, rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com, ci@dpdk.org, Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> Subject: [PATCH] Increasing ci meson version to .57 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:25:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20241008192543.800702-1-probb@iol.unh.edu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions <ci.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/> List-Post: <mailto:ci@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/ci>, <mailto:ci-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org |
Series |
Increasing ci meson version to .57
|
|
Commit Message
Patrick Robb
Oct. 8, 2024, 7:25 p.m. UTC
There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57
This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
---
.ci/linux-setup.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
Oh, I guess I should have mentioned that I did "test" this for good measure, by spinning up a base ubuntu 20.04 container, running the linux-setup.sh with this change, and did a dpdk build. Tested-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 3:27 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> > --- > .ci/linux-setup.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/.ci/linux-setup.sh b/.ci/linux-setup.sh > index 975bf32144..c7b6a86d38 100755 > --- a/.ci/linux-setup.sh > +++ b/.ci/linux-setup.sh > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > [ "$(id -u)" != '0' ] || alias sudo= > > # need to install as 'root' since some of the unit tests won't run > without it > -sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.53.2' > +sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.57' > > # setup hugepages. error ignored because having hugepage is not mandatory. > cat /proc/meminfo > -- > 2.46.1 > >
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:25:43PM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote: > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> > --- > .ci/linux-setup.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/.ci/linux-setup.sh b/.ci/linux-setup.sh > index 975bf32144..c7b6a86d38 100755 > --- a/.ci/linux-setup.sh > +++ b/.ci/linux-setup.sh > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > [ "$(id -u)" != '0' ] || alias sudo= > > # need to install as 'root' since some of the unit tests won't run without it > -sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.53.2' > +sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.57' > This change should be already covered in [1]. Regards, /Bruce [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240920125737.1197969-2-bruce.richardson@intel.com/
Haha... I guess that serves as a lesson. Thanks Bruce.
Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> writes: > Haha... I guess that serves as a lesson. > > Thanks Bruce. Probably worth it to try that patch out and add your tested-by tag :)
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:25:43 -0400 Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> I wonder if we shouldn't push it to something later. Debian stable is using 1.0.1 and testing is up to 1.5.2 0.57.0 was released on Feb 14,2021 1.0.0 was released on Dec 23, 2022 So getting a release that was more recent makes sense. The users stuck on enterprise distro's are going to have to resort to pip anyway to get a new version.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 5:43 AM Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:25:43 -0400 > Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > > > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> > > I wonder if we shouldn't push it to something later. > Debian stable is using 1.0.1 and testing is up to 1.5.2 > > 0.57.0 was released on Feb 14,2021 > 1.0.0 was released on Dec 23, 2022 > > So getting a release that was more recent makes sense. > The users stuck on enterprise distro's are going to have to resort > to pip anyway to get a new version. Tyler reported an issue for Windows with meson > 0.57. https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/ZvuoUizQiDeE62zB@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com/
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 09:47:12AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 5:43 AM Stephen Hemminger > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:25:43 -0400 > > Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote: > > > > > There is a proposed increase in the minimum meson version to .57 > > > This patch aligns the linux setup ci script with this change. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> > > > > I wonder if we shouldn't push it to something later. > > Debian stable is using 1.0.1 and testing is up to 1.5.2 > > > > 0.57.0 was released on Feb 14,2021 > > 1.0.0 was released on Dec 23, 2022 > > > > So getting a release that was more recent makes sense. > > The users stuck on enterprise distro's are going to have to resort > > to pip anyway to get a new version. > > Tyler reported an issue for Windows with meson > 0.57. > https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/ZvuoUizQiDeE62zB@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com/ > Yes, this was a factor in choosing 0.57. The other is that this is just a minimum version, so if distros are shipping later that is absolutely no problem. We are better to err on the side of being cautious here IMHO. /Bruce
diff --git a/.ci/linux-setup.sh b/.ci/linux-setup.sh index 975bf32144..c7b6a86d38 100755 --- a/.ci/linux-setup.sh +++ b/.ci/linux-setup.sh @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ [ "$(id -u)" != '0' ] || alias sudo= # need to install as 'root' since some of the unit tests won't run without it -sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.53.2' +sudo python3 -m pip install --upgrade 'meson==0.57' # setup hugepages. error ignored because having hugepage is not mandatory. cat /proc/meminfo