doc: add Vhost and Virtio updates to release note

  Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
  

01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin:
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Those changes should have been part of the original commits.
Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy
reference to the code change?
  

On 10/1/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin:
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> Those changes should have been part of the original commits.
> Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy
> reference to the code change?

I'm not convinced it is a good idea, as it creates avoidable conflicts
when someone wants to backport features.

But if you insist I can do it.
  

01/10/2020 13:45, Maxime Coquelin:
> 
> On 10/1/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin:
> >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Those changes should have been part of the original commits.
> > Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy
> > reference to the code change?
> 
> I'm not convinced it is a good idea, as it creates avoidable conflicts
> when someone wants to backport features.

Not sure I understand the conflict you think of.

> But if you insist I can do it.
  

01/10/2020 14:53, Thomas Monjalon:
> 01/10/2020 13:45, Maxime Coquelin:
> > 
> > On 10/1/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin:
> > >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> > >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > Those changes should have been part of the original commits.
> > > Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy
> > > reference to the code change?
> > 
> > I'm not convinced it is a good idea, as it creates avoidable conflicts
> > when someone wants to backport features.
> 
> Not sure I understand the conflict you think of.
> 
> > But if you insist I can do it.

I did the release notes updates in the relevant patches
while pulling next-net.
I've removed the deprecation notice as well.
  

On 10/1/20 11:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/10/2020 14:53, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 01/10/2020 13:45, Maxime Coquelin:
>>>
>>> On 10/1/20 1:42 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>> 01/10/2020 12:36, Maxime Coquelin:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> Those changes should have been part of the original commits.
>>>> Please can you add the "Fixes:" lines so we can have an easy
>>>> reference to the code change?
>>>
>>> I'm not convinced it is a good idea, as it creates avoidable conflicts
>>> when someone wants to backport features.
>>
>> Not sure I understand the conflict you think of.

I meant having both the code and release note parts in the same patch.
Sorry if I was not clear.

>>> But if you insist I can do it.
> 
> I did the release notes updates in the relevant patches
> while pulling next-net.
> I've removed the deprecation notice as well.

OK, that's fine anyway.

Thanks,
Maxime