[dpdk-dev] bond: static analysis issues fix

Message ID 1418405982-21407-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers

Commit Message

Doherty, Declan Dec. 12, 2014, 5:39 p.m. UTC
  Fixes for link bonding library identified by static analysis tool

- Overflow check for active_slaves array in activate_slave function
- Allocation check of pci_id_table in rte_eth_bond_create
- Use of eth_dev pointer in mac_address_get/set before NULL check

Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 12 ++++++++----
 lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Wodkowski, PawelX Dec. 12, 2014, 6:30 p.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:40 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: static analysis issues fix
> 
> Fixes for link bonding library identified by static analysis tool
> 
> - Overflow check for active_slaves array in activate_slave function
> - Allocation check of pci_id_table in rte_eth_bond_create
> - Use of eth_dev pointer in mac_address_get/set before NULL check
> 
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> index ef5ddf4..9cb1c1f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> @@ -115,8 +115,11 @@ activate_slave(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint8_t
> port_id)
>  	if (internals->mode == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
>  		bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(eth_dev, port_id);
> 
> -	internals->active_slaves[internals->active_slave_count] = port_id;
> -	internals->active_slave_count++;
> +	if (internals->active_slave_count <
> +			RTE_DIM(internals->active_slaves) - 1) {
> +		internals->active_slaves[internals->active_slave_count] =
> port_id;
> +		internals->active_slave_count++;
> +	}
>  }
> 
>  void
> @@ -144,7 +147,8 @@ deactivate_slave(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint8_t
> port_id)
>  					sizeof(internals->active_slaves[0]));
>  	}
> 
> -	internals->active_slave_count = active_count;
> +	internals->active_slave_count = active_count < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ?
> +			active_count : RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS - 1;

Since port might not be added twice and active_slaves array is (should be)
 proper size to contain every port you can add to bonding and in fact is
one element bigger and active_slave_count should newer overflow, those
changes might only mask real problems in user application and/or library itself.
I think if you want to make this static analysis tool happy it should be changed
to RTE_VERIFY(), assert(), rte_panic() or something like that to indicate
undefined state.

Pawel
  

Patch

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
index ef5ddf4..9cb1c1f 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_api.c
@@ -115,8 +115,11 @@  activate_slave(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint8_t port_id)
 	if (internals->mode == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
 		bond_mode_8023ad_activate_slave(eth_dev, port_id);
 
-	internals->active_slaves[internals->active_slave_count] = port_id;
-	internals->active_slave_count++;
+	if (internals->active_slave_count <
+			RTE_DIM(internals->active_slaves) - 1) {
+		internals->active_slaves[internals->active_slave_count] = port_id;
+		internals->active_slave_count++;
+	}
 }
 
 void
@@ -144,7 +147,8 @@  deactivate_slave(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, uint8_t port_id)
 					sizeof(internals->active_slaves[0]));
 	}
 
-	internals->active_slave_count = active_count;
+	internals->active_slave_count = active_count < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ?
+			active_count : RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS - 1;
 
 	if (eth_dev->data->dev_started && internals->mode == BONDING_MODE_8023AD)
 		bond_mode_8023ad_start(eth_dev);
@@ -210,7 +214,7 @@  rte_eth_bond_create(const char *name, uint8_t mode, uint8_t socket_id)
 		goto err;
 	}
 	pci_id_table = rte_zmalloc_socket(name, sizeof(*pci_id_table), 0, socket_id);
-	if (pci_drv == NULL) {
+	if (pci_id_table == NULL) {
 		RTE_BOND_LOG(ERR, "Unable to malloc pci_id_table on socket");
 		goto err;
 	}
diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
index 3db473b..bb4a537 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c
@@ -764,8 +764,6 @@  mac_address_get(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, struct ether_addr *dst_mac_addr)
 {
 	struct ether_addr *mac_addr;
 
-	mac_addr = eth_dev->data->mac_addrs;
-
 	if (eth_dev == NULL) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "%s: NULL pointer eth_dev specified\n", __func__);
 		return -1;
@@ -776,6 +774,8 @@  mac_address_get(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, struct ether_addr *dst_mac_addr)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	mac_addr = eth_dev->data->mac_addrs;
+
 	ether_addr_copy(mac_addr, dst_mac_addr);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -785,8 +785,6 @@  mac_address_set(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, struct ether_addr *new_mac_addr)
 {
 	struct ether_addr *mac_addr;
 
-	mac_addr = eth_dev->data->mac_addrs;
-
 	if (eth_dev == NULL) {
 		RTE_BOND_LOG(ERR, "NULL pointer eth_dev specified");
 		return -1;
@@ -797,6 +795,8 @@  mac_address_set(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, struct ether_addr *new_mac_addr)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	mac_addr = eth_dev->data->mac_addrs;
+
 	/* If new MAC is different to current MAC then update */
 	if (memcmp(mac_addr, new_mac_addr, sizeof(*mac_addr)) != 0)
 		memcpy(mac_addr, new_mac_addr, sizeof(*mac_addr));