doc: announce deprecation for security ops
Checks
Commit Message
Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to
be used by rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Comments
Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
On 05-Jul-23 1:14 AM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
>
>
> Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to
> be used by rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
> These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 8e1cdd677a..74bdb4f577 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
> ``rte_cryptodev_get_auth_algo_string``, ``rte_cryptodev_get_aead_algo_string`` and
> ``rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string`` respectively.
>
> +* security: Hide structures ``rte_security_ops`` and ``rte_security_ctx`` as these
> + are internal to DPDK library and PMDs.
> +
> * flow_classify: The flow_classify library and example have no maintainer.
> The library is experimental and, as such, it could be removed from DPDK.
> Its removal has been postponed to let potential users report interest
> --
> 2.25.1
>
04/07/2023 20:44, Akhil Goyal пишет:
> Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to
> be used by rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
> These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 8e1cdd677a..74bdb4f577 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
> ``rte_cryptodev_get_auth_algo_string``, ``rte_cryptodev_get_aead_algo_string`` and
> ``rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string`` respectively.
>
> +* security: Hide structures ``rte_security_ops`` and ``rte_security_ctx`` as these
> + are internal to DPDK library and PMDs.
> +
> * flow_classify: The flow_classify library and example have no maintainer.
> The library is experimental and, as such, it could be removed from DPDK.
> Its removal has been postponed to let potential users report interest
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 5:01 PM Konstantin Ananyev
<konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> 04/07/2023 20:44, Akhil Goyal пишет:
> > Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to
> > be used by rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
> > These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index 8e1cdd677a..74bdb4f577 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
> > ``rte_cryptodev_get_auth_algo_string``, ``rte_cryptodev_get_aead_algo_string`` and
> > ``rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string`` respectively.
> >
> > +* security: Hide structures ``rte_security_ops`` and ``rte_security_ctx`` as these
> > + are internal to DPDK library and PMDs.
> > +
> > * flow_classify: The flow_classify library and example have no maintainer.
> > The library is experimental and, as such, it could be removed from DPDK.
> > Its removal has been postponed to let potential users report interest
>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Hi Akhil,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Tuesday 4 July 2023 20:45
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; david.marchand@redhat.com;
> jerinj@marvell.com; anoobj@marvell.com; ndabilpuram@marvell.com; De
> Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>;
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; g.singh@nxp.com;
> konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru; Nicolau, Radu <radu.nicolau@intel.com>;
> Power, Ciara <ciara.power@intel.com>; ruifeng.wang@arm.com;
> matan@nvidia.com; fanzhang.oss@gmail.com; Akhil Goyal
> <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce deprecation for security ops
>
> Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to be used by
> rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
> These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> ---
<snip>
Seems a reasonable change to me.
Acked-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce deprecation for security ops
> >
> > Structure rte_security_ops and rte_security_ctx are meant to be used by
> > rte_security library and the PMDs associated.
> > These will be moved to an internal header in DPDK 23.11 release.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> > ---
> <snip>
>
> Seems a reasonable change to me.
>
> Acked-by: Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ Deprecation Notices
``rte_cryptodev_get_auth_algo_string``, ``rte_cryptodev_get_aead_algo_string`` and
``rte_cryptodev_asym_get_xform_string`` respectively.
+* security: Hide structures ``rte_security_ops`` and ``rte_security_ctx`` as these
+ are internal to DPDK library and PMDs.
+
* flow_classify: The flow_classify library and example have no maintainer.
The library is experimental and, as such, it could be removed from DPDK.
Its removal has been postponed to let potential users report interest