diff mbox series

[v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs

Message ID 20210629083432.1803007-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers
Series [v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Ferruh Yigit June 29, 2021, 8:34 a.m. UTC 
  As discussed in the technical board meeting
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html

This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.

Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>

v2:
* Paragraph reworded.
---
 content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

John McNamara July 1, 2021, 6:49 a.m. UTC | #1 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:35 AM
> To: web@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs
> 
> As discussed in the technical board meeting
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
> 
> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Andrew Rybchenko July 4, 2021, 3:47 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 7/1/21 9:49 AM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:35 AM
>> To: web@dpdk.org
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Mcnamara, John
>> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs
>>
>> As discussed in the technical board meeting
>> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
>>
>> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
> 
> Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> 

Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Thomas Monjalon July 14, 2021, 3:10 p.m. UTC | #3 
04/07/2021 17:47, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 7/1/21 9:49 AM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> As discussed in the technical board meeting
> >> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
> >>
> >> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
> > 
> > Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Applied, thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md
index fcdc47feca9a..7504df0f7cae 100644
--- a/content/testing/_index.md
+++ b/content/testing/_index.md
@@ -116,6 +116,10 @@  some validation reports are requested to the community members.
 
 Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement.
 
+Some PMDs can be tested only by their owners. That is why it is expected that
+device vendors send a release validation report, at least in the first release
+that the PMD is upstreamed.
+
 
 ## Tools
 ---