[1/2] net/tap: fix log loss when state fails to be restored
Checks
Commit Message
From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
After restoring the remote states, the return value of ioctl() is not
checked. Therefore, users cannot know whether the remote state is
restored successfully.
This patch add log for restoring failure.
Fixes: 4810d3af8343 ("net/tap: restore state of remote device when closing")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
On 4/22/2021 12:27 PM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>
> After restoring the remote states, the return value of ioctl() is not
> checked. Therefore, users cannot know whether the remote state is
> restored successfully.
>
> This patch add log for restoring failure.
>
> Fixes: 4810d3af8343 ("net/tap: restore state of remote device when closing")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> index 68baa18..6007c78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
> @@ -1101,6 +1101,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
> struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
> struct rx_queue *rxq;
> + int ret;
>
> if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
> rte_free(dev->process_private);
> @@ -1133,8 +1134,11 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>
> if (internals->remote_if_index) {
> /* Restore initial remote state */
> - ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
> + ret = ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
> &internals->remote_initial_flags);
> + if (ret)
> + TAP_LOG(ERR, "restore remote state failed: %d", ret);
> +
'ret' is used only in this scope, can you please move the variable declaration
at the beginning of the this if block?
You can do something like "int ret = ioctl(...."
> }
>
> rte_mempool_free(internals->gso_ctx_mp);
>
在 2021/4/26 23:30, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 4/22/2021 12:27 PM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>>
>> After restoring the remote states, the return value of ioctl() is not
>> checked. Therefore, users cannot know whether the remote state is
>> restored successfully.
>>
>> This patch add log for restoring failure.
>>
>> Fixes: 4810d3af8343 ("net/tap: restore state of remote device when closing")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> index 68baa18..6007c78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
>> @@ -1101,6 +1101,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>> struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
>> struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
>> struct rx_queue *rxq;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
>> rte_free(dev->process_private);
>> @@ -1133,8 +1134,11 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>>
>> if (internals->remote_if_index) {
>> /* Restore initial remote state */
>> - ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
>> + ret = ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
>> &internals->remote_initial_flags);
>> + if (ret)
>> + TAP_LOG(ERR, "restore remote state failed: %d", ret);
>> +
>
> 'ret' is used only in this scope, can you please move the variable declaration
> at the beginning of the this if block?
> You can do something like "int ret = ioctl(...."
>
Hi, fixed in v2, thanks.
>
>> }
>>
>> rte_mempool_free(internals->gso_ctx_mp);
>>
>
> .
>
@@ -1101,6 +1101,7 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
struct pmd_process_private *process_private = dev->process_private;
struct rx_queue *rxq;
+ int ret;
if (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY) {
rte_free(dev->process_private);
@@ -1133,8 +1134,11 @@ tap_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
if (internals->remote_if_index) {
/* Restore initial remote state */
- ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
+ ret = ioctl(internals->ioctl_sock, SIOCSIFFLAGS,
&internals->remote_initial_flags);
+ if (ret)
+ TAP_LOG(ERR, "restore remote state failed: %d", ret);
+
}
rte_mempool_free(internals->gso_ctx_mp);