[23/40] net/virtio: make Vhost-user req sender consistent

Message ID 20201220211405.313012-24-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Maxime Coquelin
Headers
Series net/virtio: Virtio PMD rework |

Checks

Context Check Description
ci/checkpatch success coding style OK

Commit Message

Maxime Coquelin Dec. 20, 2020, 9:13 p.m. UTC
  This patch makes vhost_user_write() consistent with
vhost_user_read(), by passing a pointer on the Vhost-user
message instead of a buffer pointer and its length, which
is now calculated in the function.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Chenbo Xia Jan. 6, 2021, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Maxime,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 5:14 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; olivier.matz@6wind.com;
> amorenoz@redhat.com; david.marchand@redhat.com
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 23/40] net/virtio: make Vhost-user req sender consistent
> 
> This patch makes vhost_user_write() consistent with
> vhost_user_read(), by passing a pointer on the Vhost-user

You mean a pointer 'to' the vhost-user msg? :P

Thanks,
Chenbo

> message instead of a buffer pointer and its length, which
> is now calculated in the function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
  
Maxime Coquelin Jan. 15, 2021, 9:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 1/6/21 12:50 PM, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 5:14 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; olivier.matz@6wind.com;
>> amorenoz@redhat.com; david.marchand@redhat.com
>> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 23/40] net/virtio: make Vhost-user req sender consistent
>>
>> This patch makes vhost_user_write() consistent with
>> vhost_user_read(), by passing a pointer on the Vhost-user
> 
> You mean a pointer 'to' the vhost-user msg? :P

Changed to:

"by passing a Vhost-user message pointer instead of a buffer pointer and
its length"

Thanks,
Maxime

> Thanks,
> Chenbo
> 
>> message instead of a buffer pointer and its length, which
>> is now calculated in the function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
index b93e65c60b..e9053eea95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_user.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@  struct vhost_user_msg {
 	(sizeof(struct vhost_user_msg) - VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE)
 
 static int
-vhost_user_write(int fd, void *buf, int len, int *fds, int fd_num)
+vhost_user_write(int fd, struct vhost_user_msg *msg, int *fds, int fd_num)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct msghdr msgh;
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@  vhost_user_write(int fd, void *buf, int len, int *fds, int fd_num)
 	memset(&msgh, 0, sizeof(msgh));
 	memset(control, 0, sizeof(control));
 
-	iov.iov_base = (uint8_t *)buf;
-	iov.iov_len = len;
+	iov.iov_base = (uint8_t *)msg;
+	iov.iov_len = VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE + msg->size;
 
 	msgh.msg_iov = &iov;
 	msgh.msg_iovlen = 1;
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@  vhost_user_sock(struct virtio_user_dev *dev,
 	int has_reply_ack = 0;
 	int fds[VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS];
 	int fd_num = 0;
-	int len;
 	int vhostfd = dev->vhostfd;
 
 	RTE_SET_USED(m);
@@ -359,8 +358,7 @@  vhost_user_sock(struct virtio_user_dev *dev,
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	len = VHOST_USER_HDR_SIZE + msg.size;
-	if (vhost_user_write(vhostfd, &msg, len, fds, fd_num) < 0) {
+	if (vhost_user_write(vhostfd, &msg, fds, fd_num) < 0) {
 		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "%s failed: %s",
 			    vhost_msg_strings[req], strerror(errno));
 		return -1;